Hi guys, I committed a working draft to the branch at [1]. However, there are some issues with the javadoc-plugin (see [2]) that must be fixed first in order to get the expected javadoc. The other stuff (shading of shared and impl-ee6) already works as expected!
Feel free to try it out yourself. Comments and suggestions are welcome! Regards, Jakob [1] https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/myfaces/core/branches/2.0.8_shade_prototype/ [2] https://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MJAVADOC-320 2011/7/7 Werner Punz <[email protected]>: > Excellent news ++1, the shared as we have it is a bad design decision I hope > shade will get rid of our debugging issues we have with our current shared. > > > Werner > > > Am 07.07.11 11:04, schrieb Jakob Korherr: >> >> Hi Gerhard, >> >> Thx for (re-)opening this thread. I already created a jira issue [1] >> and a core-branch [2] for prototyping. >> >> Currently I am struggling a little bit with the javadoc-plugin, but >> this stuff should be fixed soon (maybe even today). >> >> I'll let you guys know when I am done with the configuration, so that >> you can try it out yourselves! >> >> Regards, >> Jakob >> >> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-3205 >> [2] >> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/myfaces/core/branches/2.0.8_shade_prototype/ >> >> 2011/7/7 Gerhard Petracek<[email protected]>: >>> >>> hi @ all, >>> the goal (as we discussed before) is to get rid of the shared-impl module >>> and move to the shade-plugin for maven. >>> issues with javadoc and osgi bundles prevented us from doing this step. >>> however, with codi v1 we have a project(-configuration) which fixes all >>> the >>> issues we had with the shade-plugin. >>> -> imo we can (and should) use it also for myfaces-core. >>> regards, >>> gerhard >> >> >> > > > -- Jakob Korherr blog: http://www.jakobk.com twitter: http://twitter.com/jakobkorherr work: http://www.irian.at
