How detailed our proposal should be ? We should point every place that we consider to be changed ? Or it will be enough to write in detailed way, what we wanted to solve, what we have done and where are the problems ?
Pozdrawiam, Kamil Soboń iso.poczta(at)gmail.com sobon(at)student.agh.edu.pl Dnia 26-07-2011 o godz. 19:43 Mike Kienenberger <[email protected]> napisał(a): > This is the right place for your questions and proposals. > > We cannot tell you anything further until we see the proposals and details. > > > On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 1:35 PM, Kamil Soboń <[email protected]> wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> Me and my friend are trying to create modular web application that will work >> in OSGi environment. >> We have chosen JSF (MyFaces implementation) for our web tier (In fact we >> have chosen this technology in first version of our application, where we >> have implemented own mechanism for plug-in management, now we want to use >> OSGi). >> >> We have few very important assumption for web tier: views (pages), resources >> and manageable beans can be provided, changed and taken away in run-time. >> This is a result of other assumption: our application should be modularized >> in plug-ins that can be installed, updated or uninstalled in run-time. >> There are few problems with MyFaces that we were trying to omit. Some we >> have managed to, some partially and some not. I am not going to tell about >> the details, but I can tell about them or provide web site urls where we >> have written down our cogitations. >> >> After some time we have reached a conclusion that it is pointless to make >> MyFaces working as we want to, without changing things in core >> implementation. Generally we know what should be reimplemented or redesigned >> in core implementation of MyFaces. We believe that some of changes should be >> done in API to make MyFaces more flexible. Once more I am not going to tell >> about the details here (but fell free to ask). >> >> My questions are >> Is it our proposal worth of consideration ? Maybe out assumptions break down >> some JavaServer Faces assumption and this technology cannot be used in such >> application ? >> Is it right place to ask about changes in MyFaces ? >> Can you/we make such changes in core implementation, or maybe MyFaces is >> simply implementation of JSF specification ? If it is, should we turn to >> people that are responsible for JSF specification ? >> >> -- >> Pozdrawiam, >> Kamil Soboń >> >> iso.poczta(at)gmail.comturn to >> sobon(at)student.agh.edu.pl >> >>
