Hi if we roll another release it probably might make sense to get the
fix for MYFACES-3300 in as well.
Werner
Am 09.09.11 02:52, schrieb Leonardo Uribe:
Hi
Thanks Jakob for debug this one. It helps a lot. I'll send another
vote soon with the artifacts updated, but first I want to check the
code that cause this problem. Instead do a change on validate(), I
think we should fix it in other way, in the contructor(s) of
ContextAwareELException, because the spec could mention in a explicit
way how to handle validator exceptions.
regards,
Leonardo Uribe
2011/9/8 Jakob Korherr<[email protected]>:
Sorry Leo, but I have to change my vote to -1, because of MYFACES-3301.
We cannot release two MyFaces versions with a broken
ValidatorException handling mechanism!
Regards,
Jakob
2011/9/8 Jakob Korherr<[email protected]>:
+1
Regards,
Jakob
2011/9/7 Werner Punz<[email protected]>:
+1
Am 07.09.11 09:18, schrieb Leonardo Uribe:
+1
2011/9/6 Leonardo Uribe<[email protected]>:
Hi,
I was running the needed tasks to get the 2.1.3 release of Apache
MyFaces core out.
This is a quick bug-fix release for the following issues.
* [MYFACES-3294] - REGRESSION: 2.0.7->2.0.8: Facets lost after
validation error POST-back
* [MYFACES-3298] - h:outputText incorectly renders an extra<span>
* [MYFACES-3291] - jsf.js make the comments and structures jsdoc
toolkit friendly
* [MYFACES-3295] - Replace RendererUtils.renderChild() by
UIComponent.encodeAll()
The artifacts passed all TCK tests.
Please note that this vote concerns all of the following parts:
1. Maven artifact group "org.apache.myfaces.core" v2.1.3 [1]
The artifacts were deployed on nexus repo [1] and to my private
Apache account [3] for binary and source packages.
The release notes could be found at [4].
Also the clirr test does not show binary incompatibilities with
myfaces-api.
Please take a look at the "2.1.3" artifacts and vote!
Please note: This vote is "majority approval" with a minimum of three
+1 votes (see [3]).
------------------------------------------------
[ ] +1 for community members who have reviewed the bits
[ ] +0
[ ] -1 for fatal flaws that should cause these bits not to be released,
and why..............
------------------------------------------------
Thanks,
Leonardo Uribe
[1]
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemyfaces-040/org/apache/myfaces/
[2] http://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html#ReleaseVotes
[3] http://people.apache.org/~lu4242/myfaces213binsrc
[4]
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10600&version=12317642
--
Jakob Korherr
blog: http://www.jakobk.com
twitter: http://twitter.com/jakobkorherr
work: http://www.irian.at
--
Jakob Korherr
blog: http://www.jakobk.com
twitter: http://twitter.com/jakobkorherr
work: http://www.irian.at
