+1 regards, gerhard
http://www.irian.at Your JSF powerhouse - JSF Consulting, Development and Courses in English and German Professional Support for Apache MyFaces 2011/11/14 Mark Struberg <[email protected]>: > +1 from me also. Sounds like a very good plan. > > LieGrue, > strub > > > > ----- Original Message ----- >> From: Leonardo Uribe <[email protected]> >> To: MyFaces Development <[email protected]> >> Cc: >> Sent: Monday, November 14, 2011 10:22 PM >> Subject: Re: [TRINIDAD] Some status >> >> Hi >> >> +1, sounds good. Maybe we should think about use other code highlight >> library with a license compatible with apache, but make a release >> comes first, so this should not be an stopper for that. >> >> regards, >> >> Leonardo Uribe >> >> 2011/11/14 Scott O'Bryan <[email protected]>: >>> Okay everyone, >>> >>> In case you were wondering of the status of Trinidad, here's where we >> are >>> at. There have been some major hurdles with JSF 2.0 and 2.1 that we have >>> been cleaning up (and my schedule has been tight as a result). Furthermore >>> we had a licensing issue with the Component Showcase which prevented the >>> release of Trinidad 2.0.1. >>> >>> So I'm going to try to get a release out this week and here is what I >>> propose: >>> >>> 1. I'm going to disable the Component Showcase from being distributed >> as >>> part of our builds. It will still be available in the source, but not as a >>> distributable. This will prevent us from distributing stuff with the LGPL >>> liscense (thanks for catching this guys). >>> >>> 2. I'm going to sync up the Trinidad 2.0.1 tag with what's >> currently in >>> Trunk. A lot of high priority issues came in and were fixed shortly after >>> the licensing issue was discovered and so I held off on the release of >>> Trinidad 2.0.1 until we could get these addressed and things had >> stabilized. >>> It looks like they have a bit so I'm thinking the trunk would make a >> good >>> 2.0.1 release rather then what is currently in the tag. >>> >>> 3. I'd like the change the trunk to become Trinidad 2.1.0 to reflect >> our >>> Faces 2.1 work. JSF 2.1 will be the bottom dependency for that branch. >> The >>> current 2.0.x branch would be moved to the branches for further bug fixing >>> and stuff (much like we did with 2.0 and 1.2). >>> >>> Please respond to this over the next day or so, so that I can get a feel >> for >>> what the community believes is best. :) >>> >>> Scott >>> >> >
