[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PORTLETBRIDGE-219?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13155498#comment-13155498
 ] 

Michael Freedman commented on PORTLETBRIDGE-219:
------------------------------------------------

Fixed in the 2.0 Trunk and oracle branches by adding the distinct resource 
param to hold the viewId.  Work still pending in the 3.0 Trunk.
                
> NonFaces in protocol resource request fails after and action
> ------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: PORTLETBRIDGE-219
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PORTLETBRIDGE-219
>             Project: MyFaces Portlet Bridge
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Impl
>    Affects Versions: 2.0.0, 3.0.0-alpha
>            Reporter: Michael Freedman
>            Assignee: Michael Freedman
>
> Impl relies on the same render parameter to hold the viewId at the end of an 
> action or in a resourceURL that references a Faces resource.  Hence the check 
> in Bridge during a resource request on whether the request is for a Faces or 
> NonFaces resource depends on whether this render parameter exists or not.  
> The problem is in that in a resource URL this isn't really a render parameter 
> but rather a resource parameter.  The resource receives the current portlet 
> render parameters + its url encoded resource parameters.  This means that if 
> an action occurs it will set the VIEWID render parameter.  If in the render 
> following this action we create and render a resource url to a nonFaces 
> resource request then when this resource request is sent we will still 
> receive the VIEWID parameter and incorrectly think this is Faces resource 
> request when its a nonFaces one.  
> Fix is to have a distinct resource param to hold the viewId for Faces 
> resource URL.  Then the check looks for existence/nonexistence of this param 
> and ignores whether the render param VIEWID is there.  Note:  when making 
> this fix will also need to update the code that resolves the view to execute 
> as we will need to test if we are in a resource request and pull from the 
> right param.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

        

Reply via email to