Cool, it looks like we have a lazy consensus on this item. In the past
I think that's been enough to simply move code around. Unless anyone
raises an objection, I'll probably plan on doing this tomorrow.
Thanks for all your input. Now we can fix those pesky
CompositeComponent issues for the 2.1 folks.. ;)
Scott
On Tue 27 Mar 2012 10:26:21 AM MDT, Jeanne Waldman wrote:
+1
Prakash Udupa wrote, On 3/26/2012 8:14 AM PT:
+1
On 3/26/2012 9:45 AM, Matt Cooper wrote:
+1
On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 8:42 AM, <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
+1
On Mar 25, 2012, at 9:17 AM, Scott O'Bryan <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
> Hey all,
>
> Currently the Trinidad Trunk is set to JSF 2.0. There have
been a number of blocker bugs recently (namely some issues with
the ViewDeclarationLanguages and composite components) which
have generated some blocking bugs. These problems were cause by
additional methods in the ViewDeclarationLanguage syntax which
we have to wrap for some of the functionality in Trinidad to be
complete.
>
> At this time I propose the following:
>
> 1. Copy the current Trinidad Trunk to be branches/trinidad-2.0.x
> 2. Change the version of Trinidad Trunk to be 2.1.0-SNAPSHOT
> 3. Change the JSF dependency for trunk to be MyFaces 2.1
> 4. Change the trinidad plugins trunk to be 2.1.0 for consistency.
> 5. Change both branches/trinidad-2.0.x and trunk to use the
new trinidad plugins snapshot.
>
> I'm hoping everyone will agree to this so that we can fix some
of the blocker issues we've had show up after the the last
Trinidad release. Many of which seem to be JSF 2.1 related.
>
> Please respond to this email with a +1 or a -1 and don't
forget to include any any reasons why you do not wish to support
the move.
>
> Thanks,
> Scott
