Hi

Just to keep it clear: MyFaces Core 2.1.7 in a typical situation is a
lot faster than 2.1.6, which suppose a server that are working with
enough memory to deal with the load. The effect described here is
reasonable, and compared with the app classloader mem leak already
solved it is ok let the code as is. A hack to prevent it, is overkill.
Instead, the application must be tuned to use the right scopes (JSF
View Scope or MyFaces CODI window scope or conversation scope), to
prevent hold many beans on the session when it is not necessary, and
in that way increase the memory available.

regards,

Leonardo Uribe

2012/5/11 Mark Struberg <[email protected]>:
>
>
> Hi!
>
> Please open a new bug and link it to the original one as follow up.
>
>
> The funny thing is that this effect doesn't show up in all scenarios. I 
> measured a pretty good performance improvement from 2.1.6 to 2.1.7 in my app.
>
> Are the pages in your app rather small or big?
>
>
> txs and LieGrue,
> strub
>
>
>>________________________________
>> From: PEREZ ALCAIDE JESUS <[email protected]>
>>To: MyFaces Development <[email protected]>
>>Cc: MARTIN POZO RUBEN <[email protected]>
>>Sent: Friday, May 11, 2012 1:18 PM
>>Subject: Performance loss with MyFaces 2.1.7
>>
>>
>>
>>Hello,
>>
>>I've done a performance test comparing between versions of MyFaces 2.1.6 and 
>>2.1.7. The result has been that version 2.1.7 has a worse performance, about 
>>25% worse in requests per second and about 50% worse in response time. These 
>>data are obtained by doing load tests on a server until it reaches saturation 
>>(the CPU reaches a 90-100% usage).
>>
>>Comparing with JProfiler two executions of these load tests, one with version 
>>2.1.6 and one with version 2.1.7, we see clearly that the problem seems to be 
>>that the number of invocations of 
>>the method Thread.getContextClassLoader () has 
>>increased significantly (+300k invocations more) and has therefore increased 
>>the time in this method (+50 s).
>>
>>This change comes from the solution to the bug MyFaces-3510 [1] where a 
>>change was made on _ComponentAttributesMap class.
>>
>>Leonardo, what do you think about this?
>>
>>Should I reopen the bug MyFaces-3510 or create a new bug?
>>
>>[1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-3510
>>
>>
>>Un saludo,
>>
>>Jesús Pérez Alcaide
>>Lab. Banksphere - Runtime
>>Tlf:  91 470 5223
>>
>>
>>*********************AVISO LEGAL **********************
>>Este mensaje es privado y confidencial y solamente para la persona a la que 
>>va dirigido. Si usted ha recibido este mensaje por error, no debe revelar, 
>>copiar, distribuir o usarlo en ningún sentido. Le rogamos lo comunique al 
>>remitente y borre dicho mensaje
> y cualquier documento adjunto que pudiera contener. No hay renuncia a la 
> confidencialidad ni a ningún privilegio por causa de transmisión errónea o 
> mal funcionamiento.
>>Cualquier opinión expresada en este mensaje pertenece únicamente al autor 
>>remitente, y no representa necesariamente la opinión de ISBAN, a no ser que 
>>expresamente se diga y el remitente esté autorizado para hacerlo.
>>Los correos electrónicos no son seguros, no garantizan la confidencialidad ni 
>>la correcta recepción de los mismos, dado que pueden ser interceptados, 
>>manipulados, destruidos, llegar con demora o incompletos, o con virus. ISBAN 
>>no se hace responsable de los
> cambios, alteraciones, errores u omisiones que pudieran hacerse al mensaje 
> una vez enviado.
>>Este mensaje sólo tiene una finalidad de información, y no debe interpretarse 
>>como una oferta de venta o de compra de valores ni de instrumentos 
>>financieros relacionados.
>>
>>**********************DISCLAIMER*****************
>>This message is private and confidential and it is intended exclusively for 
>>the addressee. If you receive this message by mistake, you should not 
>>disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail. Please inform the sender and 
>>delete the message and attachments from
> your system. No confidentiality nor any privilege regarding the information 
> is waived or lost by any mistransmission or malfunction.
>>Any views or opinions contained in this message are solely those of the 
>>author, and do not necessarily represent those of ISBAN, unless otherwise 
>>specifically stated and the sender is authorized to do so.
>>E-mail transmission cannot be guaranteed to be secure, confidential, or 
>>error-free, as information could be intercepted, corrupted, lost, destroyed, 
>>arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses. ISBAN does not accept 
>>responsibility for any changes, errors
> or omissions in the contents of this message after it has been sent.
>>This message is provided for informational purposes and should not be 
>>construed as a solicitation or offer to buy or sell any securities or related 
>>financial instruments.
>>
>>
>>

Reply via email to