2012/11/14 Mike Kienenberger <[email protected]>: > Guys, > > In my opinion, any time someone feels the need to revert SOMEONE > ELSE's code without that person's consent, the first step must be to > have a public discussion on the topic, unless it is an obvious > immediate security bug. > > We shouldn't be seeing revert wars, then a discussion. >
+1 for discuss the concrete topic in public in deep, from a technical perspective, before do any change in the code. I'll explain the problem in deep in another mail, so people can get the idea about what we are discussing about. > > On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 4:23 PM, <[email protected]> wrote: >> Author: lu4242 >> Date: Wed Nov 14 21:23:35 2012 >> New Revision: 1409414 >> >> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1409414&view=rev >> Log: >> MYFACES-3638 revert commit 1408993 to include later solution without >> refactoring.
