Hi 2012/11/15 Mark Struberg <[email protected]>: > We have 2 StateManager implementations. Guess the following classes can now > get deleted? > > * JspStateManagerImpl > > * MyfacesStateManager > > or alternate question: the HtmlResponseStateManager extends > MyfacesResponseStateManager. > If we keep that pattern, why does the StateManagerImpl which seems to be the > 'new' one doesn't extend MyFacesStateManager? >
MyfacesResponseStateManager is a leftover from jsf 1.1.x. In that time, the idea was to store the state using javascript but right now that class does nothing. Remove that code is a valid option. > Either keep both or delete both. > Btw: such classes _always_ need to get annotated with @Deprecated + JavaDoc > or even better they should get immediately deleted. > I would vote for delete them, because that part was not fully done, so it has never worked. > > LieGrue, > strub >
