My understanding is that there was no 2.2 to work in when this branch was started.
The idea was to "get it right" in 2.1 in our proprietary implementation, and then use that to insure that the 2.2 spec worked in practice as well as in theory. On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 3:20 AM, Mark Struberg <[email protected]> wrote: > I checked the work done in there and Imo this is far from usable. Let's get > the windowId right in 2.2 an backport it later. > > > It doesn't make any sense to have 2 branches to do try & error in this area. > To stress your butterfly analogy: there is a difference between a cocoon and > a hydra ;) > > LieGrue, > strub >
