+1. That will reduce overhead.
2012/11/16 Mike Kienenberger <[email protected]>: > +1 > > On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 2:54 AM, Mark Struberg <[email protected]> wrote: >> +1 >> >> LieGrue, >> strub >> >> PS: vote is open for 72h with lazy consensus (as always if nothing else >> stated) >> >> >> >> >> ----- Original Message ----- >>> From: Mark Struberg <[email protected]> >>> To: My Faces Development <[email protected]> >>> Cc: >>> Sent: Friday, November 16, 2012 8:25 AM >>> Subject: [VOTE] switching MyFaces-2.0.x to maintenance mode >>> >>>T he JSF-2.0 spec came out in early 2009. There is a clarification/bugfix >>>release >>> 2.1 of the spec available since over 2 years now and we actively maintain >>> MyFaces-2.1.x >>> >>> Thus I like to suggest moving MyFaces-2.0.x into maintenance mode. >>> >>> It's purely crazy that we backport any change from 2.1.x to 2.0.x still. >>> This is perfectly fine for heavy bugs of course, but not for new >>> enhancements >>> and 'featuers'. As we've seen recently this introduces bugs which >>> are avoidable. >>> >>> Maintenance mode means that we will fix blockers and security >>> vulnerabilities >>> like we still do in 1.x if required. But we will not do any further >>> development. >>> >>> >>> >>> [+1] move MyFaces-2.0.x into maintenance mode >>> [+0] I don't care >>> [-1] no, we still need the latest and greatest improvements in MyFaces-2.0.x >>> >>> LieGrue, >>> strub >>>
