-0.2 it is imo not really worth it. The benefits are just too small, and the complexity is too high.
LieGrue, strub >________________________________ > From: Thomas Andraschko <[email protected]> >To: MyFaces Development <[email protected]> >Sent: Friday, February 8, 2013 6:31 PM >Subject: Re: [core][discuss] Is it worth to include Stateless JSF / View >Pooling concept into MyFaces? > > >+0 from my side. >Hacking third party libraries is actually a no-go. > > >2013/2/5 Leonardo Uribe <[email protected]> > >Hi >> >>2013/2/5 Thomas Andraschko <[email protected]>: >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> from the performance perspective, it's a great feature. 8% and more are >>> really much. >>> On the other hand, i thought it would be more improvement (like 15-20%). >>> >> >>That's the point. It is because the previous improvements done that the >>difference now is only 8%. >> >> >>> I don't know about the maintenance effort, maybe it would be better to >>> search optimizations in other places. >>> >> >>In this moment we have exhausted almost all the possibilities. We can >>always improve the code, but in my opinion the gain if possible will be >>very small (less than 1% or 2%). >> >>From maintenance perspective, the problem is that the hack requires some >>changes in the component classes (specifically give the ability to reset >>the state). So, it is necessary to change third party libraries to make it >>work, and at the end the scope of the technique will be limited. >> >>Is maintenance a problem? in my opinion only if there is enough people >>interested in use the code proposed. >> >>regards, >> >>Leonardo Uribe >> >>> Regards, >>> Thomas >> > > >
