short addition:

instead of injecting the conversation for a bean (like it's used in the
example), you would inject the WindowContextManager.
-> e.g.: WindowContextManager#getCurrentWindowContext#close

regards,
gerhard

http://www.irian.at

Your JSF/JavaEE powerhouse -
JavaEE Consulting, Development and
Courses in English and German

Professional Support for Apache MyFaces



2013/5/21 Gerhard Petracek <[email protected]>

> hi paul,
>
> i think most use arquillian for it, however, you can have a look at
> codi-se (see [1]).
> it's a small feasibility study, but you should be able to use it as a
> starting point.
>
> regards,
> gerhard
>
> [1] https://bitbucket.org/os890/codi-addons/src
>
> http://www.irian.at
>
> Your JSF/JavaEE powerhouse -
> JavaEE Consulting, Development and
> Courses in English and German
>
> Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
>
>
>
> 2013/5/20 P. Grillo <[email protected]>
>
> We are trying to write simple junit4 test cases but do not wish to deal
>> with
>> WebDriver or Browser Logons.  Is there anyway that we can force a Create
>> WindowContext/Conversation - Destroy WindowContext/Conversation in setup
>> and
>> breakdown?   Seems like Conversations can be handled, but the
>> WindowContext
>> is key.
>>
>>  We have no need to test multiple conversations within WindowContext.  We
>> simply need the container (CDI ...) to create and destroy those contexts
>> before and after the test.  We simply wish to test some beans that are
>> dependent on injecting a simple WindowContext Bean ...
>>
>> I was hoping that there was a way to explicitly provide this capability
>> along with a WindowContextId.
>>
>> Any help would be much appreciated ...
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> View this message in context:
>> http://myfaces.10567.n7.nabble.com/MyFaces-CODI-WindowContext-Mock-tp114858.html
>> Sent from the My Faces - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>>
>
>

Reply via email to