[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-4003?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Leonardo Uribe reopened MYFACES-4003:
-------------------------------------

There is a small problem with the location of testClassAttribute.xhtml . It 
should be on the same folder in src/test/resources as the package name of the 
Test class.

It looks like the related issue in Mojarra is:

https://java.net/jira/browse/JAVASERVERFACES-3025

Since facelets 1.1.x, this rule was in 
org.apache.myfaces.view.facelets.tag.jsf.html.HtmlComponentHandler. The old 
rule is still there, but the new case is justified and I can't imagine a case 
where this change could cause a problem. After all, you can always override the 
metadata ruleset.

> Allow the "class" Attribute To Be Set For Custom Tags
> -----------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: MYFACES-4003
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-4003
>             Project: MyFaces Core
>          Issue Type: Bug
>    Affects Versions: 2.2.8
>         Environment: Tomcat 8.0.21, MyFaces 2.2.8
>            Reporter: Bill Lucy
>            Assignee: Bill Lucy
>            Priority: Minor
>             Fix For: 2.2.9-SNAPSHOT
>
>         Attachments: JSFClassTagTest.war, myfaces-4003.patch
>
>
> For native JSF tags, setting the "class" attribute performs as you'd expect; 
> however, in user-defined tags, setting the "class" attribute results in the  
> following exception:
> java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: Component property class is not writable 
> Which is how we've behaved traditionally.  Using the "styleClass" attribute 
> instead does work as expected.  
> Mojarra supports setting the "class" attribute as of 2.2.9.  Additionally, 
> the same issue was fixed in MYFACES-3874 for jsf:class.  
> Changing the behavior of MyFaces here - to allow for custom components to 
> accept the "class" attribute without Exceptions - should be fairly trivial, 
> along the lines of MYFACES-3874.  



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to