[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-4042?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Leonardo Uribe updated MYFACES-4042:
------------------------------------
Resolution: Fixed
Assignee: Leonardo Uribe
Fix Version/s: 2.2.10
Status: Resolved (was: Patch Available)
I have committed a modified version of the patch, adding some documentation and
also including the check for a system property is the one in web.xml is not
set. Thanks to Bill Lucy for provide this patch.
> Improve startup time by skipping classpath jar scan for *.faces-config.xml
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: MYFACES-4042
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-4042
> Project: MyFaces Core
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Affects Versions: 2.1.18, 2.2.9
> Environment: WebSphere
> Reporter: Bill Lucy
> Assignee: Leonardo Uribe
> Priority: Minor
> Fix For: 2.2.10
>
> Attachments: MYFACES-4042.patch
>
>
> In version 2.1 org.apache.myfaces.ee6.MyFacesContainerInitializer was updated
> to scan for faces-config.xml resources in applications JARs during startup,
> as part of the process to add a FacesConfig in onStartup(). This is a very
> expensive scan, since we have to iterate over every file in every jar on the
> app classpath.
> This scan is not completely necessary: in the spec we have:
> Section 11.4.2 “Application Startup Behavior”
> Implementations may check for the presence of a servlet-class definition of
> class javax.faces.webapp.FacesServlet in the web application deployment
> descriptor as a means to abort the configuration process and reduce startup
> time for applications that do not use JavaServer Faces Technology.
> Which I interpret to mean that skipping checking the app jars at init time -
> for the purpose of adding a dynamic FacesServlet - is valid. Given the
> performance hit for the scan, I think adding a context param to disable the
> scan would be worthwhile. Something like:
> org.apache.myfaces.INITIALIZE_SKIP_JAR_FACES_CONFIG_SCAN
> Would this be worthwhile for others?
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
