Thanks for the feedback Leonardo. I opened the following issue and provided a potential fix: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-4047
I'd like a review and then I can commit the fix. Thanks, Paul Nicolucci From: Leonardo Uribe <[email protected]> To: MyFaces Development <[email protected]> Date: 05/17/2016 03:31 PM Subject: Re: CDIEnabled app does not invoke PreDestroy on javax.faces.bean.ViewScoped ManagedBeans Hi It is not a common case, but it could be valid. It is not supposed to use javax.faces.bean.ViewScoped on CDI enabled container because the idea was to replace all managed beans with CDI beans. But cases like this one should work. +1 for create an issue for this one in the issue tracker. regards, Leonardo Uribe 2016-05-17 11:23 GMT-05:00 Paul Nicolucci <[email protected]>: Hi, I've been reviewing a scenario the past couple of days. Consider the following: Bean1: @Named @ViewScoped (javax.faces.view.ViewScoped) Bean2: @ManagedBean @ViewScoped (javax.faces.bean.ViewScoped) When the session is invalidated the org.apache.myfaces.cdi.impl.CDIManagedBeanHandlerImpl.onSessionDestroyed () method is invoked. Here, MyFaces destroys all of the javax.faces.view.ViewScoped @Named beans and @PreDestroy is invoked on these beans. However, the @ManagedBean /ViewScoped bean does not have its @PreDestroy invoked. I believe this is because the assumption was made that if an Application is CDI enabled it will contain all CDI @Named beans and not any @ManagedBeans. There is also the DefaultViewScopeHandler which is not yet implemented for "onSessionDestroyed" that would be used in the case when CDI is not enabled, that is when only @ManagedBeans are contained in the application. I believe it is possible to update the CDIManagedBeanHandlerImpl to be aware of the ViewScoped ManagedBeans and destroy them onSessionDestroy first by just getting the viewMap and iterating over the entries as we do when the PreDestroyViewMapEvent is processed. I'd like to hear thoughts on this before I open a JIRA or provide a patch for both scenarios to ensure I'm not overlooking something here. Thanks, Paul Nicolucci
