Proposal migration to git:
We should request migration to gitbox without issues support on github.
I would like to keep Jira as bugtracking tool. We can revisit this later.
We should migrate only active maintained projects.
Candidates are:
Tobago and Trinidad
MyFaces Core

Any objections?
Is a formal vote required or is lazy consensus enough?

I can request Tobago and Trinidad migration. If successful and after some
testing we can request migration of Core as well.

Regards

Bernd


On Fri, Jul 28, 2017 at 11:04 AM, Dora Rajappan <dorarajap...@yahoo.com>
wrote:

> mojarra download url of github.com is also mirror and it actually goes to
> java.net domain.
> https://maven.java.net/content/repositories/releases/
> org/glassfish/javax.faces/2.3.2/
>
>
> On Friday, July 28, 2017, 2:22:03 PM GMT+5:30, Dora Rajappan <
> dorarajap...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>
> Hi ,
>
>  Thanks for the information on Git hub for apache. I found mojarra latest
> downloads in github.com and understand the domain is a trusted site from
> this discussion. https://github.com/javaserverfaces/mojarra/
> releases/tag/2.3.2.
>
> Nice to know myfaces projects are going to apache git. I can find the
> myfaces mirrors already in github.com!
>
> Thanks & Regards,
> Dora Rajappan,
> 9986201824.
>
>
>
> On Thursday, July 27, 2017, 9:03:55 PM GMT+5:30, Bernd Bohmann <
> bernd.bohm...@googlemail.com> wrote:
>
>
> Hello Dora
>
> this is not possible for apache projects
>
> see: https://git-wip-us.apache.org
>
> and
>
> https://www.apache.org/dev/writable-git
>
> but there are readonly mirrors at https://github.com/apache
>
> Regards
>
> Bernd
>
> On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 4:10 PM, Dora Rajappan <dorarajap...@yahoo.com>
> wrote:
>
> Is it github.com where you are going to migrate myfaces to?
>
>
> On Thursday, July 27, 2017, 7:06:06 PM GMT+5:30, Bernd Bohmann <
> bernd.bohm...@googlemail.com> wrote:
>
>
> for Trinidad as well
>
> On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 2:29 PM, Udo Schnurpfeil <lof...@apache.org>
> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> for Tobago I think, we can do it now!
>
> Regards,
>
> Udo
>
> Am 27.07.17 um 13:03 schrieb Bernd Bohmann:
> > Ok
> >
> > we have some agreement about moving to git.
> > Now we should define some time line.
> > Any suggestions from the active subprojects?
> >
> > Something like
> > 'I would like to move to git after blah blah release'
> > 'I would like to move now'
> > 'I would like to move in 2 weeks'
> > or whatever
> >
> > I can support the migration to git.
> >
> > Regards
> >
> > Bernd
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 5:16 PM, Kito Mann <kito.m...@virtua.com
> > <mailto:kito.m...@virtua.com>> wrote:
> >
> >     Ah, this may be why it's worked for me -- smaller projects with
> >     defined release cycles.
> >
> >     Anyway, I never meant to imply that git == git flow. We will need
> >     some sort of process, though, and the DeltaSpike one seems like a
> >     good place to start.
> >
> >     ___
> >
> >     Kito D. Mann | @kito99 | Author, JSF in Action
> >     Web Components, Polymer, JSF, PrimeFaces, Java EE training and
> >     consulting
> >     Virtua, Inc. | virtua.tech
> >     JSFCentral.com | @jsfcentral | knowesis.io <http://knowesis.io> -
> >     fresh Web Components info
> >     +1 203-998-0403 <tel:(203)%20998-0403>
> >
> >     * See me speak at the ng-conf April 5th-8th: http://bit.ly/2mw7HBj
> >     <http://bit.ly/2kr0fWI>
> >     * Listen to the Enterprise Java Newscast:
> http://enterprisejavanews.com
> >
> >
> >     On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 8:02 AM, Mark Struberg <strub...@yahoo.de
> >     <mailto:strub...@yahoo.de>> wrote:
> >
> >         gitflow is pure pita ;)
> >         It basically only works for companies where you have a single
> >         manager who decides what goes in and what not.
> >
> >         But GIT != gitflow. gitflow has nothing to do with the GIT scm
> >         itself, but is just a fancy name for a development process with
> >         an explicit build-branch and a build-master.
> >
> >         +0 on moving to GIT.
> >         SVN works good enough imo, but GIT ofc also would work.
> >
> >         LIeGrue,
> >         strub
> >
> >         > Am 19.04.2017 um 12:57 schrieb Kito Mann <kito.m...@virtua.com
> >         <mailto:kito.m...@virtua.com> > :
> >         >
> >         > +1
> >         >
> >         > Wha's wrong with GitFlow?
> >         >
> >         > ___
> >         >
> >         > Kito D. Mann | @kito99 | Author, JSF in Action
> >         > Web Components, Polymer, JSF, PrimeFaces, Java EE training and
> >         consulting
> >         > Virtua, Inc. | virtua.tech
> >         > JSFCentral.com | @jsfcentral | knowesis.io
> >         <http://knowesis.io> - fresh Web Components info
> >         > +1 203-998-0403 <tel:%2B1%20203-998-0403>
> >         >
> >         > * See me speak at the ng-conf April 5th-8th:
> http://bit.ly/2mw7HBj
> >         > * Listen to the Enterprise Java Newscast:
> >         http://enterprisejavanews.com
> >         >
> >         >
> >         > On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 4:29 AM, Bernd Bohmann
> >         <bernd.bohm...@googlemail.com
> >         <mailto:bernd.bohmann@ googlemail.com
> <bernd.bohm...@googlemail.com>>> wrote:
> >         > Hello
> >         >
> >         > I think the changes will be not so complicated. The deltaspike
> >         pom looks nice :-)
> >         > If someone talks about git-flow process i'm out.
> >         >
> >         > Regards
> >         >
> >         > Bernd
> >         >
> >         > On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 12:28 AM, Leonardo Uribe
> >         <lu4...@gmail.com <mailto:lu4...@gmail.com>> wrote:
> >         > +1
> >         >
> >         > Change the release process is a pain, but I agree there are
> >         some benefits moving to git.
> >         >
> >         > But when I see here:
> >         >
> >         > https://github.com/apache/ myfaces
> <https://github.com/apache/myfaces>
> >         <https://github.com/apache/ myfaces
> <https://github.com/apache/myfaces>>
> >         >
> >         > It says:
> >         >
> >         > mirrored from git://git.apache.org/myfaces. git
> <http://git.apache.org/myfaces.git>
> >         <http://git.apache.org/ myfaces.git
> <http://git.apache.org/myfaces.git>>
> >         >
> >         > But I have never checked where that file is or how to change
> it.
> >         >
> >         > Looking in deltaspike, the svn repo only has the site (for the
> >         CMS) and the source code lives on git. If that so, we still need
> >         the svn, so I agree it is a good idea to move only some
> >         subprojects to git.
> >         >
> >         > regards,
> >         >
> >         > Leonardo Uribe
> >         >
> >         >
> >         >       Virus-free. www.avast.com <http://www.avast.com>
> >         >
> >         > 2017-04-17 11:40 GMT-05:00 Grant Smith <work.gr...@gmail.com
> >         <mailto:work.gr...@gmail.com> > :
> >         > +1
> >         >
> >         > Couldn't agree more.
> >         >
> >         > Grant Smith - V.P. Information Technology
> >         > Marathon Computer Systems, LLC.
> >         >
> >         > On Thu, Apr 13, 2017 at 2:39 AM, Bernd Bohmann
> >         <bernd.bohm...@atanion.com <mailto:bernd.bohmann@atanion. com
> <bernd.bohm...@atanion.com>>>
> >         wrote:
> >         > From my side a big
> >         >
> >         > +1
> >         >
> >         > I'm still happy with subversion but for others the
> >         collaboration is easier and the project visibility a little bit
> >         better.
> >         >
> >         > Regards
> >         >
> >         > Bernd
> >         >
> >         > Am 13.04.2017 09:41 schrieb "Thomas Andraschko"
> >         <andraschko.tho...@gmail.com <mailto:andraschko.thomas@
> gmail.com <andraschko.tho...@gmail.com>>>:
> >         > +0
> >         > I usually just work on MF core and there it doesn't make much
> >         difference.
> >         >
> >         > 2017-04-13 8:57 GMT+02:00 Dennis Kieselhorst <m...@dekies.de
> >         <mailto:m...@dekies.de>>:
> >         > Hi,
> >         >
> >         > have you ever thought of migrating to Git? I see more and more
> >         Apache
> >         > projects moving. In the past SVN or Git didn't make any
> >         difference to me
> >         > but now I'm thinking that as an Open Source project you need
> to be
> >         > present on GitHub to get Pull Requests from the community.
> >         It's much
> >         > more fun contributing there than attaching patches to JIRA
> issues.
> >         >
> >         > We could start with Trinidad and Tobago to avoid conflicts
> >         with the 2.3
> >         > release.
> >         >
> >         > Cheers
> >         > Dennis
> >         >
> >         >
> >         >
> >         >
> >         >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
>

Reply via email to