I think it could be helpful to add a dependencies section for the commons-* runtime libs the older releases need? But yeah, most of the important info is here.
On Tue, Jul 28, 2020 at 11:57 AM Thomas Andraschko < [email protected]> wrote: > IMO core is now almost done, please check it. We just need to add the SPI > secion to each version: > https://myfaces.apache.org/wiki/core/user-guide/configuration-of-special-features/integration-with-application-and-web-servers.html > > Am Di., 28. Juli 2020 um 14:33 Uhr schrieb Bill Lucy <[email protected]>: > >> I agree, the menu looks good - the search bar in particular is helpful. >> The content layout for each release (I see that you've filled out them all >> now) makes sense to me. >> >> On Mon, Jul 27, 2020 at 11:16 AM Thomas Andraschko < >> [email protected]> wrote: >> >>> *quite good >>> >>> Am Mo., 27. Juli 2020 um 17:11 Uhr schrieb Thomas Andraschko < >>> [email protected]>: >>> >>>> Please checkout Core and 2.2 again :) >>>> I added all context params by modifying the WebContextParamsLogger >>>> >>>> I think also the menu structure is quite now. >>>> >>>> Am Mo., 27. Juli 2020 um 15:10 Uhr schrieb Paul Nicolucci < >>>> [email protected]>: >>>> >>>>> +1 for the link to javadoc.io, I think that would actually work very >>>>> nicely. >>>>> >>>>> Regards, >>>>> >>>>> Paul Nicolucci >>>>> >>>>> On Mon, Jul 27, 2020 at 8:59 AM Thomas Andraschko < >>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Hi, >>>>>> >>>>>> i think we could still host the javadoc by ourself if we want. We can >>>>>> just generate the javadoc html (without the other site stuff) + copy it >>>>>> in >>>>>> a subfolder of the homepage. >>>>>> But in general i would i add a link to: https://javadoc.io/ >>>>>> >>>>>> WDYT? >>>>>> >>>>>> Best regards, >>>>>> Thomas >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Am Mo., 27. Juli 2020 um 14:42 Uhr schrieb Paul Nicolucci < >>>>>> [email protected]>: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Hi, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Having had to update the site recently a few times I like the idea >>>>>>> of making this easier to do. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> One thing that comes to mind is would we still be able to generate >>>>>>> and deploy the docs? For example: >>>>>>> https://myfaces.apache.org/core23/javadoc.html >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Paul Nicolucci >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Mon, Jul 27, 2020 at 8:31 AM Bill Lucy <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I'm absolutely in favor of updating the site if we can improve the >>>>>>>> ease of maintainability. The current site has a lot of stale >>>>>>>> information >>>>>>>> which would be nice to update or get rid of. Markdown is great for >>>>>>>> lowering the barrier to making updates - I like the example you've >>>>>>>> come up >>>>>>>> with. I think losing the automatic context param configuration doc >>>>>>>> generation is a small downside - it won't be difficult to add the >>>>>>>> markdown >>>>>>>> for a new param in the rare event that we create a new one. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Overall +1 from me for overhauling the site. I like the format of >>>>>>>> what you've gotten started with. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Regards, >>>>>>>> Bill >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Mon, Jul 27, 2020 at 5:21 AM Thomas Andraschko < >>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> up ;) >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Am Mi., 22. Juli 2020 um 14:48 Uhr schrieb Thomas Andraschko < >>>>>>>>> [email protected]>: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Hi, >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> as you all know, the MyFaces homepage is very old. I also tried >>>>>>>>>> to get the site plugin running for Core 2.3-next but i didn't get it >>>>>>>>>> working. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> I really would like to get rid of the whole maven generation site >>>>>>>>>> and just a something MUCH easier like asciidoctor or markdown. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> I setup something here: >>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/tandraschko/myfaces-homepage >>>>>>>>>> Preview: >>>>>>>>>> https://raw.githack.com/tandraschko/myfaces-homepage/master/ >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> It uses markdown and docsify! This makes the maintenance very >>>>>>>>>> very easy for the future. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> What needs to be done: >>>>>>>>>> - Transfer content >>>>>>>>>> - Styling >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Whats the downside of it? >>>>>>>>>> We cant use our maven plugins to generate the "context param >>>>>>>>>> config" page, it needs to be done manually. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> WDYT? >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Best regards, >>>>>>>>>> Thomas >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>
