Hi, 

Thanks for working on these so quickly! I've run build twice now, and both runs 
were successful!  Looks to be revolved!  :) 

Thanks again! 

On 2023/02/16 11:20:56 Werner Punz wrote:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-4565 is fixed, but @Volodymyr
> Siedlecki <[email protected]> please check whether it is fixed
> for you.
> 
> 
> Am Do., 16. Feb. 2023 um 10:34 Uhr schrieb Werner Punz <
> [email protected]>:
> 
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-4565 @Volodymyr Siedlecki
> > <[email protected]> please have a look!
> >
> >
> > Am Do., 16. Feb. 2023 um 10:22 Uhr schrieb Werner Punz <
> > [email protected]>:
> >
> >> Second case might be TempDirFileCacheResourceLoader related. I was not
> >> working on this one, but I will file an issue here for me for now, given I
> >> know that part a little bit! This resource loader is basically just there
> >> for small speed improvements.
> >>
> >>
> >> Am Do., 16. Feb. 2023 um 10:09 Uhr schrieb Werner Punz <
> >> [email protected]>:
> >>
> >>> The ajax test issue is resolved, the test was at fault for having a wait
> >>> timeout for findElements of Zero, which causes race conditions!
> >>>
> >>> The second issue might be a similar race condition issue, given that it
> >>> does not show up on my machine!
> >>> But someone else should look into it!
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Am Do., 16. Feb. 2023 um 08:24 Uhr schrieb Werner Punz <
> >>> [email protected]>:
> >>>
> >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-4564
> >>>> I have created one for the timeout issue. I will take care of it today.
> >>>>
> >>>> Werner
> >>>>
> >>>> Am Do., 16. Feb. 2023 um 08:21 Uhr schrieb Werner Punz <
> >>>> [email protected]>:
> >>>>
> >>>>> Hi I will have a look at this. Re Tabletest, the test probably needs
> >>>>> to be adapted here, it still uses timeouts instead of waiting for
> >>>>> conditions on the dom, the new JS code is somewhat slower in execution 
> >>>>> (not
> >>>>> by miles, but it is slower given the higher level of abstraction). I 
> >>>>> will
> >>>>> take over the test. It executes fine on my machine, so it is very very
> >>>>> likely a timeout issue which needs to be fixed on test level! The second
> >>>>> test, someone else has to look into.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Am Do., 16. Feb. 2023 um 05:58 Uhr schrieb Volodymyr Siedlecki <
> >>>>> [email protected]>:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> Hi,
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> I was hoping to have a release vote out today, but I've been hit by a
> >>>>>> numerous errors when building MyFaces.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Some have disappeared already (through no action of my own), but the
> >>>>>> one I keep getting the most is this ajax one:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> [INFO] [ERROR] Tests run: 6, Failures: 0, Errors: 1, Skipped: 0, Time
> >>>>>> elapsed: 21.554 s <<< FAILURE! - in
> >>>>>> org.apache.myfaces.core.integrationtests.ajax.IntegrationTest
> >>>>>> [INFO] [ERROR]
> >>>>>> org.apache.myfaces.core.integrationtests.ajax.IntegrationTest.testBasicTable
> >>>>>> Time elapsed: 6.733 s  <<< ERROR!
> >>>>>> [INFO] org.openqa.selenium.TimeoutException: Expected condition
> >>>>>> failed: waiting for
> >>>>>> org.apache.myfaces.core.integrationtests.ajax.IntegrationTest$$Lambda$675/0x000000080085b040@2f54f746
> >>>>>> (tried for 0 second(s) with 500 milliseconds interval)
> >>>>>> [INFO]  at
> >>>>>> org.openqa.selenium.support.ui.WebDriverWait.timeoutException(WebDriverWait.java:87)
> >>>>>> ...
> >>>>>> [INFO]  at
> >>>>>> org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ForkedBooter.execute(ForkedBooter.java:169)
> >>>>>> [INFO]  at
> >>>>>> org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ForkedBooter.run(ForkedBooter.java:595)
> >>>>>> [INFO]  at
> >>>>>> org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ForkedBooter.main(ForkedBooter.java:581)
> >>>>>> [INFO] Caused by: org.openqa.selenium.NoSuchElementException: no such
> >>>>>> element: Unable to locate element: {"method":"css
> >>>>>> selector","selector":"#head_row1_0"}
> >>>>>> [INFO]   (Session info: headless chrome=110.0.5481.100)
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Others:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> CompositeComponentValueChangeListenerTestCase.testSimpleValueChangeListenerNoTarget:336
> >>>>>> » NullPointer
> >>>>>> _________
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> [ERROR] Errors:
> >>>>>> [ERROR]
> >>>>>>  
> >>>>>> AcidMyFacesRequestTestCase.testAddSimpleCCVDL3:1075->AbstractMyFacesRequestTestCase.processLifecycleExecuteAndRender:225->AbstractMyFacesRequestTestCase.renderResponse:256->AbstractMyFacesTestCase.renderResponse:551
> >>>>>> » Faces java.lang.NullPointerException
> >>>>>> _____
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> ———————————————————————————————————————
> >>>>>> Test set:
> >>>>>> org.apache.myfaces.view.facelets.tag.composite.CompositeComponentNestedCCTestCase
> >>>>>> ———————————————————————————————————————
> >>>>>> Tests run: 14, Failures: 0, Errors: 1, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed:
> >>>>>> 2.572 s <<< FAILURE! - in
> >>>>>> org.apache.myfaces.view.facelets.tag.composite.CompositeComponentNestedCCTestCase
> >>>>>> org.apache.myfaces.view.facelets.tag.composite.CompositeComponentMethodExpressionTestCase.testCompositeMethodExpressionTarget2
> >>>>>> Time elapsed: 0.106 s  <<< ERROR!
> >>>>>> java.lang.NullPointerException
> >>>>>>         at
> >>>>>> org.apache.myfaces.resource.TempDirFileCacheResourceLoader.deleteDir(TempDirFileCacheResourceLoader.java:145)
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Has anyone encountered these...?
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> On 2023/02/15 19:30:06 Melloware wrote:
> >>>>>> > +1 from me.
> >>>>>> >
> >>>>>> > On 2/15/2023 10:06 AM, Volodymyr Siedlecki wrote:
> >>>>>> > > Hello,
> >>>>>> > >
> >>>>>> > > Is the code ready for an RC5 release? I saw Thomas and Werner
> >>>>>> have
> >>>>>> > > some discussion regarding  building on windows, but a fix was
> >>>>>> just
> >>>>>> > > merged in.
> >>>>>> > >
> >>>>>> > > I would like to merge https://github.com/apache/myfaces/pull/520
> >>>>>> > > (MYFACES-4561), if possible, but it shouldn't hold up RC5.
> >>>>>> > >
> >>>>>> > > If there's anything else that should be merged in, let me know.
> >>>>>> > >
> >>>>>> > > Thanks,
> >>>>>> > > Volodymyr
> >>>>>> >
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>
> 

Reply via email to