Hey Werner! Thanks!

I hate to hijack this thread but wanted to make sure you were aware of the
issues we're facing with the TCK and the new JS. We have a thread started
yesterday:
https://markmail.org/message/ebpszw2hqyovp6ue#query:+page:1+mid:pvnqrp7oqkh24aud+state:results

Regards,

Paul Nicolucci

On Tue, Feb 21, 2023 at 9:07 AM Thomas Andraschko <
andraschko.tho...@gmail.com> wrote:

> +1 yep, less and easier code is always worth refactoring
>
> Am Di., 21. Feb. 2023 um 15:00 Uhr schrieb Melloware <
> melloware...@gmail.com>:
>
>> Less code is always better for me. :)  even if there is no performance
>> gain.
>>
>>
>> On 2/21/2023 8:39 AM, Werner Punz wrote:
>> > Hi everyone, just a short update about my plans on our ajax codebase
>> > post 4.0.0.
>> > I have planned following and have opened a branch for the post 4.0
>> > release on my github project.
>> > I have opened a feature branch, where I try new things out:
>> >
>> > https://github.com/werpu/jsfs_js_ts/tree/feature/new_things
>> >
>> > a) Given that the last remnants of IE11 now are phased out by
>> > Microsoft, I can drop another compatibility layer.
>> >
>> > The streams will be replaced with arrays internally the 2 missing
>> > methods can be shimmed in.
>> > This already is done on my feature branch and working. Saves
>> > 15-20kbyte of code on faces-development.js
>> > (in faces.js not so much 1-2kbyte). I was able to add the shims
>> > without altering the javascript array itself!
>> > I donĀ“t expect a huge change in performance by moving from Streams to
>> > native api.
>> >
>> > The lazy streams had some advantages over array processing, but that
>> > is made up by native execution of parts of
>> > the code now.
>> > It is mostly to phase out another now mostly obsolete API!
>> >
>> > b) I was able to simplify the request queue controller. It now is as
>> > barebones as it can get:
>> > https://gist.github.com/werpu/54479ab8bff0f1c11bf67dc33fd663c5
>> >
>> > Other plans, just mostly cleanup and fixes for bugs. The XhrRequest is
>> > the last component which could benefit from another round of cleanup!
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>>
>

Reply via email to