[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-4536?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17771458#comment-17771458
]
Werner Punz edited comment on MYFACES-4536 at 10/3/23 12:18 PM:
----------------------------------------------------------------
Ok I will alter my test accordingly, lets see!
Still passing:
[https://gist.github.com/werpu/93e05f0cba260be33349afec8564c9d9]
Is producing:
{code:java}
<?xml version="1.0"
encoding="UTF-8"?><partial-response><changes><eval><![CDATA[if(window.PrimeFaces){PrimeFaces.csp.init('NjcwMDg5ZDgtYmEwZi00NDAzLWI3Y2MtZTk1OTY4Y2VjNzY2');};;PrimeFaces.csp.register('j_id_7k:j_id_7l:globalFilter','onchange',function(event){PF('customersTable').filter()});PrimeFaces.csp.register('j_id_7k:j_id_7l:j_id_7o','onclick',function(event){PrimeFaces.ab({s:"j_id_7k:j_id_7l:j_id_7o",f:"j_id_7k",u:"@form"});return
false;});;]]></eval></partial-response>
{code}
So no swallowed eval!
was (Author: werpu):
Ok I will alter my test accordingly, lets see!
> PartialResponseWriter: Do no wrap the writer
> --------------------------------------------
>
> Key: MYFACES-4536
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-4536
> Project: MyFaces Core
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: General
> Affects Versions: 2.2.14, 2.3.10, 2.3-next-M7, 4.0.0-RC2
> Reporter: Melloware
> Assignee: Werner Punz
> Priority: Major
> Attachments: csp-results.zip, image-2023-10-02-20-33-05-162.png,
> mojarra-csp-new.txt
>
>
> Per BalusC:
> Since JSF 2.3 the default constructor of {{FacesWrapper}} subclasses has been
> deprecated in order to force implementors to instead use the constructor
> taking the wrapped instance (and to raise their awareness), so that logically
> the inherited {{getWrapped()}} method will be used throughout the
> implementation instead of the local {{wrapped}} variable. This will ensure
> that the correct implementation is returned and correct behavior is performed
> might the {{FacesWrapper}} implementation itself being wrapped by yet another
> {{FacesWrapper}} implementation further down the chain. Because, when the
> {{FacesWrapper}} implementation incorrectly/accidentally uses the local
> {{wrapped}} variable instead of the {{getWrapped()}} method, then that other
> {{FacesWrapper}} implementation will basically be completely ignored, hereby
> breaking the decorator pattern.
>
> PrimeFaces ticket: https://github.com/primefaces/primefaces/issues/9518
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)
