Getting results in now, but tests are still running: 

ee.jakarta.tck.faces.test.servlet30.ajax_selenium.Issue2179IT
testDecodeException 

https://github.com/jakartaee/faces/blob/4.1.2-RELEASE/tck/faces22/ajax/src/test/java/ee/jakarta/tck/faces/test/servlet30/ajax_selenium/Issue2179IT.java#L49
 

Expected: Name: 
form:submit Error: serverError
Actual: 
Name: form:submit Error:  decode: A RuntimeException Has Occurred!

 This one can be ignored as the expected value is slightly different as it's 
hard coded in the test. 
___________

com.sun.ts.tests.jsf.api.jakarta_faces.render.renderkit.URLClient
renderKitCreateResponseWriterInvalidContentTypeTest
https://github.com/jakartaee/faces/blob/4.1.2-RELEASE/tck/old-tck/source/src/com/sun/ts/tests/jsf/api/jakarta_faces/render/renderkit/TestServlet.java#L290
Expect:
??? (Not sure by the test)
Actual: 
“No Exception thrown when passing an invalid content type to the 
createResponseWriter() method.” 

Logs:
[javatest.batch] 03-18-2025 15:13:06:  TRACE: [BaseUrlClient] EXECUTING
[javatest.batch] 03-18-2025 15:13:06:  [HttpRequest] Dispatching request: 'GET 
/jsf_render_renderkit_web/TestServlet?testname=renderKitCreateResponseWriterInvalidContentTypeTest
 HTTP/1.0' to target server at 'localhost:9080'
[javatest.batch] 03-18-2025 15:13:06:  TRACE: ########## The real value set: 
false
[javatest.batch] 03-18-2025 15:13:06:  TRACE: [WIRE] - >> "GET 
/jsf_render_renderkit_web/TestServlet?testname=renderKitCreateResponseWriterInvalidContentTypeTest
 HTTP/1.0[\r][\n]"
[javatest.batch] 03-18-2025 15:13:06:  TRACE: [WIRE] - >> "User-Agent: 
JavaServer Faces TCK/2.2[\r][\n]"
[javatest.batch] 03-18-2025 15:13:06:  TRACE: [WIRE] - >> "Host: 
localhost:9080[\r][\n]"
[javatest.batch] 03-18-2025 15:13:06:  TRACE: [WIRE] - >> "[\r][\n]"
[javatest.batch] 03-18-2025 15:13:06:  TRACE: [WIRE] - << "HTTP/1.0 200 
OK[\r][\n]"
[javatest.batch] 03-18-2025 15:13:06:  TRACE: [WIRE] - << "HTTP/1.0 200 
OK[\r][\n]"
[javatest.batch] 03-18-2025 15:13:06:  TRACE: [WIRE] - << "Content-Type: 
text/plain;charset=ISO-8859-1[\r][\n]"
[javatest.batch] 03-18-2025 15:13:06:  TRACE: [WIRE] - << "Content-Language: 
en-US[\r][\n]"
[javatest.batch] 03-18-2025 15:13:06:  TRACE: [WIRE] - << "Date: Tue, 18 Mar 
2025 15:13:06 GMT[\r][\n]"
[javatest.batch] 03-18-2025 15:13:06:  TRACE: [WIRE] - << "[\r][\n]"
[javatest.batch] 03-18-2025 15:13:06:  TRACE: [WIRE] - Going to buffer response 
body of large or unknown size. Using getResponseBodyAsStream instead is 
recommended.
[javatest.batch] 03-18-2025 15:13:06:  TRACE: [WIRE] - << "No Exception thrown 
when passing an invalid content type to the createResponseWriter() method.[\n]"
[javatest.batch] 03-18-2025 15:13:06:  TRACE: [WIRE] - HttpConnectionManager is 
null.  Connection cannot be released.
[javatest.batch] 03-18-2025 15:13:06:  TRACE: [WebValidatorBase] Scanning 
response for search string: 'Test PASSED' starting at index location: 0
[javatest.batch] 03-18-2025 15:13:06:  ERROR: [WebValidatorBase] Unable to find 
the following search string in the server's response: 'Test PASSED' at index: 0
[javatest.batch] [WebValidatorBase] Server's response:
[javatest.batch] -------------------------------------------
[javatest.batch] No Exception thrown when passing an invalid content type to 
the createResponseWriter() method.
[javatest.batch] 
[javatest.batch] -------------------------------------------
[javatest.batch] 
[javatest.batch] 03-18-2025 15:13:06:  ERROR: Test case throws exception: 
[BaseUrlClient] renderKitCreateResponseWriterInvalidContentTypeTest failed! 
Check output for cause of failure.
[javatest.batch] 03-18-2025 15:13:06:  ERROR: Exception at:  
[javatest.batch] 03-18-2025 15:13:06:  ERROR: 
com.sun.ts.tests.common.webclient.TestFailureException: Test FAILED!
[javatest.batch]        at 
com.sun.ts.tests.common.webclient.WebTestCase.execute(WebTestCase.java:184)
[javatest.batch]        at 
com.sun.ts.tests.common.webclient.BaseUrlClient.invoke(BaseUrlClient.java:456)
[javatest.batch]        at 
com.sun.ts.tests.jsf.api.jakarta_faces.render.renderkit.URLClient.renderKitCreateResponseWriterInvalidContentTypeTest(URLClient.java:144)
[javatest.batch]        at 
java.base/jdk.internal.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
[javatest.batch]        at 
java.base/jdk.internal.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:77)
[javatest.batch]        at 
java.base/jdk.internal.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
[javatest.batch]        at 
java.base/java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:575)
[javatest.batch]        at com.sun.ts.lib.harness.EETest.run(EETest.java:596)
[javatest.batch]        at 
com.sun.ts.lib.harness.EETest.getPropsReady(EETest.java:486)
[javatest.batch]        at com.sun.ts.lib.harness.EETest.run(EETest.java:337)
[javatest.batch]        at 
com.sun.ts.tests.jsf.api.jakarta_faces.render.renderkit.URLClient.run(URLClient.java:42)
[javatest.batch]        at 
com.sun.ts.tests.jsf.api.jakarta_faces.render.renderkit.URLClient.main(URLClient.java:34)
[javatest.batch] 
[javatest.batch] 03-18-2025 15:13:06:  [BaseUrlClient] Test cleanup OK

What changed here?  I'm don't quiet understand what the expected value is here? 

On 2025/03/18 14:54:11 Volodymyr Siedlecki wrote:
> Sorry for the delay! It's been busy.  With log exception NPE out of the way 
> now, I'm running TCK builds at the moment for 4.0.3 and 4.1.1. If they look 
> good, I'll get the email vote out for both releases. I should have results 
> tonight and, if they look good, I'll sent out the vote emails.  
> 
> On 2025/03/13 21:03:51 Melloware Inc wrote:
> > Bump?
> > 
> > On Tue, Mar 11, 2025 at 10:33 PM Volodymyr Siedlecki <volos...@apache.org>
> > wrote:
> > 
> > > Yes, I am able to get a successful build now.
> > >
> > > I'll get a release started tomorrow morning. Thanks!
> > >
> > > On 2025/03/11 21:40:03 Thomas Andraschko wrote:
> > > > Should work now again!?
> > > >
> > > > Volodymyr Siedlecki <volos...@apache.org> schrieb am Mo., 10. März 2025,
> > > > 18:43:
> > > >
> > > > > Just following up.
> > > > >
> > > > > On 2025/03/07 09:15:11 Thomas Andraschko wrote:
> > > > > > Seems to be related to Werners changes on the AjaxScript rendering.
> > > Can
> > > > > you
> > > > > > check this Werner?
> > > > > > I can just fix the test but the build in the master branch just
> > > works. So
> > > > > > there might be just some missing cherry picking of commits?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Am Do., 6. März 2025 um 17:13 Uhr schrieb Volodymyr Siedlecki <
> > > > > > volos...@apache.org>:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > Hi,
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > I'm unable to get a clean build.  I usually get one of the two
> > > errors
> > > > > (
> > > > > > > AcidPssRefreshMyFacesRequestTestCase /
> > > ViewPoolMyFacesRequestTestCase)
> > > > > > > below. Can anyone investigate to see if this is happening in your
> > > > > > > environments? Thanks!
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > 1)
> > > > > > > [INFO] Tests run: 4, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time
> > > elapsed:
> > > > > > > 19.553 s - in
> > > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > org.apache.myfaces.view.facelets.pss.acid.AcidPssRefreshMyFacesRequestTestCase
> > > > > > > [INFO]
> > > > > > > [INFO] Results:
> > > > > > > [INFO]
> > > > > > > [ERROR] Failures:
> > > > > > > [ERROR]
> > >  DefaultHtmlDecoratorTestCase.testConvertTagAttributes6:600
> > > > > > > onclick ( onclick="faces.util.chain(this, 
> > > > > > > event,'alert(\'hello\')',
> > > > > > > 'myfaces.ab(this,event,\'click\',\'\',\'myForm:box5\')');") was
> > > > > rendered
> > > > > > > less times (0) than expected (1).
> > > > > > > Actual HTML: <script
> > > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > src="myfaces/impl/target/test-classes/org/apache/myfaces/view/facelets/tag/faces/html//jakarta.faces.resource/faces.js?ln=jakarta.faces&amp;stage=UnitTest"><!--
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > //--></script><div id="myForm:box6" name="myForm:box6"
> > > > > > > onclick="faces.util.chain(this, event,'alert(\'hello\')',
> > > > > > > 'myfaces.ab(this,event,\'click\',\'\',\'myForm:box5\',{})');">
> > > > > > >             MYBOX6
> > > > > > >         </div>
> > > > > > > [INFO]
> > > > > > > [ERROR] Tests run: 1577, Failures: 1, Errors: 0, Skipped: 2
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > 2)
> > > > > > > [INFO] Tests run: 11, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time
> > > elapsed:
> > > > > > > 83.835 s - in
> > > > > > >
> > > org.apache.myfaces.view.facelets.pool.ViewPoolMyFacesRequestTestCase
> > > > > > > [INFO]
> > > > > > > [INFO] Results:
> > > > > > > [INFO]
> > > > > > > [ERROR] Failures:
> > > > > > > [ERROR]
> > >  DefaultHtmlDecoratorTestCase.testConvertTagAttributes6:600
> > > > > > > onclick ( onclick="faces.util.chain(this, 
> > > > > > > event,'alert(\'hello\')',
> > > > > > > 'myfaces.ab(this,event,\'click\',\'\',\'myForm:box5\')');") was
> > > > > rendered
> > > > > > > less times (0) than expected (1).
> > > > > > > Actual HTML: <script
> > > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > src="myfaces/impl/target/test-classes/org/apache/myfaces/view/facelets/tag/faces/html//jakarta.faces.resource/faces.js?ln=jakarta.faces&amp;stage=UnitTest"><!--
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > //--></script><div id="myForm:box6" name="myForm:box6"
> > > > > > > onclick="faces.util.chain(this, event,'alert(\'hello\')',
> > > > > > > 'myfaces.ab(this,event,\'click\',\'\',\'myForm:box5\',{})');">
> > > > > > >             MYBOX6
> > > > > > >         </div>
> > > > > > > [INFO]
> > > > > > > [ERROR] Tests run: 1577, Failures: 1, Errors: 0, Skipped: 2
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On 2025/03/05 15:47:40 Werner Punz wrote:
> > > > > > > > Command back, it seems there is an issue the Tobago code
> > > triggered
> > > > > by the
> > > > > > > > source element fix recently! I can give the ok for the release
> > > for
> > > > > now
> > > > > > > > until I get other infos!
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Am Mi., 5. März 2025 um 10:14 Uhr schrieb Werner Punz <
> > > > > > > werner.p...@gmail.com
> > > > > > > > >:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > sorry for stalling it, the Tobago people have an issue with 
> > > > > > > > > the
> > > > > latest
> > > > > > > ts
> > > > > > > > > code, they are not sure whether the bug is on my side or their
> > > > > side,
> > > > > > > please
> > > > > > > > > let them investigate first. I will give the ok or stop it when
> > > I
> > > > > know
> > > > > > > more!
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Am Di., 4. März 2025 um 04:01 Uhr schrieb Volodymyr Siedlecki 
> > > > > > > > > <
> > > > > > > > > volos...@apache.org>:
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >> Hi. Sorry for the delay, but I will start on a release in the
> > > next
> > > > > > > day or
> > > > > > > > >> two.
> > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > >> Thanks!
> > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > >> On 2025/03/03 22:15:21 Werner Punz wrote:
> > > > > > > > >> > No objection from my side!
> > > > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > > > >> > Am Mo., 3. März 2025 um 22:53 Uhr schrieb Melloware Inc <
> > > > > > > > >> > melloware...@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > > > >> > > Volodymr bumping this. I think 4.1.1 has some good fixes
> > > in
> > > > > it.
> > > > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > > > >> > > On Tue, Feb 18, 2025 at 3:56 AM Thomas Andraschko <
> > > > > > > > >> > > andraschko.tho...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > > > >> > >> Hi,
> > > > > > > > >> > >>
> > > > > > > > >> > >> WDYT about a 4.1.1 release? I would need some of the
> > > fixes
> > > > > for my
> > > > > > > > >> project.
> > > > > > > > >> > >> @Volodymr could you do me the favor, or we need to wait
> > > for
> > > > > other
> > > > > > > > >> issue
> > > > > > > > >> > >> to be fixed?
> > > > > > > > >> > >>
> > > > > > > > >> > >> Best regards,
> > > > > > > > >> > >> Thomas
> > > > > > > > >> > >>
> > > > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > > > >> > > --
> > > > > > > > >> > > ==============================
> > > > > > > > >> > > Melloware
> > > > > > > > >> > > melloware...@gmail.com
> > > > > > > > >> > > http://melloware.com
> > > > > > > > >> > > ==============================
> > > > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > 
> > 
> > -- 
> > ==============================
> > Melloware
> > melloware...@gmail.com
> > http://melloware.com
> > ==============================
> > 
> 

Reply via email to