> On 8. Jul 2017, at 00:16, amit mehta <gmate.a...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> On Fri, Jul 7, 2017 at 10:02 PM, will sanfilippo <wi...@runtime.io> wrote: >> When I had looked at this before (a few years back) the ARM compiler beat >> every other compiler (not surprisingly). And like Marko said, no company I >> worked for wanted to pay for the compiler even though it did reduce code >> size between 10 and 15%. >> > I too faced this problem of code size [1] in past and indeed my boss as well > was not interested in paying huge amount of money to those vendors were > charging at that time. > > [1] > https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/question/44407/application-binary-size-significantly-bigger-when-using-gnu-toolchain/
Hi, As often priorities differ. In my case it meant we could stick to a 64k flash variant instead of 128k variant. For a >100k/yr volume product it was easy math for management..... regards, Raoul van Bergen
