So, when is a decision going to be made?
On Thu, Feb 8, 2018, at 11:15 AM, Miguel Azevedo wrote:
> I strongly agree to track issues on github, the integration with
> github issues and PRs is very good and there's a lot of people already
> using it on other projects.
> On Thu, Feb 8, 2018 at 5:34 AM, Fabio Utzig <ut...@apache.org> wrote:
> > +1
> > I prefer as much information in a single place as possible, and GH as been
> > adding more and more "project management" features making it better suited
> > as a Jira alternative (and btw, we already made this move with MCUBoot!).
> > Cheers,
> > Fabio Utzig
> > On Tue, Feb 6, 2018, at 2:27 PM, Christopher Collins wrote:
> >> On Tue, Feb 06, 2018 at 12:26:17AM -0800, aditi hilbert wrote:
> >> > Hi,
> >> >
> >> > Multiple people have suggested that issues be tracked on Github close
> >> > to the code. The benefit is that contributors don’t have to switch
> >> > between two systems to raise and clear issues. Please let your
> >> > thoughts known either way.
> >> I agree with switching to github issues.
> >> Jira seems more powerful and I do like it, but I find the extra
> >> flexibility is outweighed by the difficulty of using two different
> >> systems (github for PRs, Jira for issues).
> >> Chris
> Miguel Azevedo