My vote would be ms
> On Feb 4, 2016, at 8:19 PM, Sterling Hughes <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
>> Proposed change:
>>
>> wes@~/tmp/ble_capture/scan$ newtmgr -cusbA6 taskstats
>> Return Code = 0
>> idle (prio=255 tid=0 runtime=102525 cswcnt=4070 stack: 17/32 (53%)
>> last_checkin=0 next_checkin=0)
>>
>
> +1 for this one. Do you think that runtime should be displayed in increments
> of os_time_tick or ms? Today they are the same thing, but what should the
> unit display be.
>
>>
>> this could also possibly be this (but I prefer the first one)
>>
>> wes@~/tmp/ble_capture/scan$ newtmgr -cusbA6 taskstats
>> Return Code = 0
>> idle (prio=255 tid=0 runtime=102525 cswcnt=4070 stack (used/size): 17/32
>> (53%) last_checkin=0 next_checkin=0)
>>
>> Comments?
>>
