Hi, > OK, thanks for the heads up. Is this something we should deal with > immediately, or can we fix it between now and our next release?
Best to fix now IMO, otherwise the incubator release may not pass. I’d say the risk is low but it’s there. That being said an incubating release doesn’t have to be perfect so up to you. > Yes, I believe so. Thanks again! I think the LICENSE is still missing a number of things, do you look at my email when I went through the repos and listed what was contained in them? I know things have changed a little in tadpole/larval repos but everythink that is bundled needs to be accounted for. e.g. Baselibc for instance has several files in it that are licensed under other terms. [1] If it helps I can go through and list out what I think they are missing. Also I thought we were removing anything with the "MCD-ST Liberty SW License”? (It’s not a comparable licence) See larval ./hw/mcu/stm/stm32f4xx/include/mcu/system_stm32f4xx.h Thanks, Justin 1. http://www.apache.org/dev/licensing-howto.html#guiding-principle
