Whoops, thanks Justin. I didn't see that note in time. Perhaps I should monitor my email periodically :).
I think the repositories may actually be ready for a release. Rat seems happy with them in their current state (with their .rat-excludes files, of course). The Compliance Rocks! tool had a number of complaints, but they all appear to be in reference to the third-party files that we know aren't Apache licensed. Is there anything else you can think of that I might have missed? Thanks, Chris On Tue, Feb 23, 2016 at 08:44:25AM +1100, Justin Mclean wrote: > Hi, > > Again no harm done but no required. JFYI - Files without any creative > content don’t need a license header, .gitignore would fall under that. [1] > > Justin > > 1. http://www.apache.org/legal/src-headers.html#faq-exceptions
