I like the idea of having different names. I think nmp is fine for the protocol.
On 4/6/16, 7:24 PM, "Christopher Collins" <ccoll...@apache.org> wrote: >Hello all, > >There are two things called "newtmgr": > >1. A simple command-response protocol used for interfacing with mynewt > devices (the newtmgr server code is at core:libs/newtmgr). >2. A CLI tool which communicates with mynewt devics via the newtmgr >protocol > (newt:newtmgr). > >I have had a hard time discussing both of these entities due to the >overloaded name. In the interest of preventing an endless series of >"who's on first" fiascos, I propose we rename the name of the protocol. > >I suggest we rename the protocol to: nmp. I don't really care about the >name, though, as long as it is unique :). > >Alternatively, the tool could be renamed, but I thought newtmgr sounds >more like a tool than a protocol. > >Thanks, >Chris
