Hello David:

I took a peek at the evaluation board you mentioned. We dont have that eval 
board in house nor do we have that flavor of st chip in house, but getting 
mynewt up and running on this would certainly be possible.  It appears that 
this is the 256K Flash/32KB RAM version on that eval board. Is that correct? If 
so, that should be plenty of space for mynewt and a really killer app!

What you would need to do is to create a bsp for this board and add MCU support 
for it. I am not a huge fan of STM32Cube but that is the SDK that ST points to 
for this eval board so using that code for the HAL would be the quickest route 
if you wanted HAL for it. Of course, you dont need to support the HAL in the 
first cut (just pieces you needed).

We have tutorials on creating bsps and adding mcu support on the mynewt page so 
if you wanted to take a crack at adding support that would be great. We love 
feedback on the tutorials and we are always around to help if you have 
questions.


> On May 19, 2016, at 9:56 AM, David G. Simmons <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> Is this something that is supported/possible? I don’t happen to have an 
> STM32F3DISCOVERY board, but I do happen to have one of these lying around. If 
> anyone has used this board, or knows haow to get it up and running with 
> mynewt, I’d appreciate some pointers/help.
> 
> Best regards,
> dg
> --
> David G. Simmons
> (919) 534-5099
> Web <https://davidgs.com/> • Blog <https://davidgs.com/davidgs_blog> • 
> Linkedin <http://linkedin.com/in/davidgsimmons> • Twitter 
> <http://twitter.com/TechEvangelist1> • GitHub <http://github.com/davidgs>
> /** Message digitally signed for security and authenticity.  
>  * If you cannot read the PGP.sig attachment, please go to 
>  * http://www.gnupg.com/ <http://www.gnupg.com/> Secure your email!!!
>  * Public key available at keyserver.pgp.com <http://keyserver.pgp.com/>
> **/
> ♺ This email uses 100% recycled electrons. Don't blow it by printing!
> 
> There are only 2 hard things in computer science: Cache invalidation, naming 
> things, and off-by-one errors.
> 
> 

Reply via email to