I agree. Keeping OS_EINVAL makes sense.
Regards,
Vipul Rahane
> On Jun 18, 2016, at 12:51 PM, Christopher Collins <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Hello all,
>
> I noticed libs/os/include/os/os.h defines the following two error codes:
>
> OS_EINVAL = 2,
> OS_INVALID_PARM = 3,
>
> Do these error codes convey different results? After a brief look
> through the code, my impression is that they mean the same thing. If
> that is the case, I think one of the error codes should be removed. My
> personal preference would be to keep OS_EINVAL just because EINVAL has a
> well understood meaning.
>
> Thanks,
> Chris
