Yes, possibly. We never should have used 500 there. It should be in terms of OS_TICKS_PER SEC. Some bsps now use 128 ticks per second
So that is probably it. > On Oct 21, 2016, at 11:17 AM, David G. Simmons <[email protected]> wrote: > > Has there been a change in os_time_delay()? os_time_delay(500) used to be a > half-second delay. Now it is a 5-second delay. > > dg > -- > David G. Simmons > (919) 534-5099 > Web <https://davidgs.com/> • Blog <https://davidgs.com/davidgs_blog> • > Linkedin <http://linkedin.com/in/davidgsimmons> • Twitter > <http://twitter.com/TechEvangelist1> • GitHub <http://github.com/davidgs> > /** Message digitally signed for security and authenticity. > * If you cannot read the PGP.sig attachment, please go to > * http://www.gnupg.com/ <http://www.gnupg.com/> Secure your email!!! > * Public key available at keyserver.pgp.com <http://keyserver.pgp.com/> > **/ > ♺ This email uses 100% recycled electrons. Don't blow it by printing! > > There are only 2 hard things in computer science: Cache invalidation, naming > things, and off-by-one errors. > >
