I believe that this is now defined in the syscfg.ym file in the stats package 
and is called STATS_NAMES.

> On Oct 27, 2016, at 8:12 AM, David G. Simmons <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> So I'm properly on the develop branch, finally. 
> I've properly built and loaded bletiny onto the nrf52dk board, and verified 
> that it is running.
> 
> 52358: > tasks
> Tasks:
> 52799:  idle (prio: 255, tid: 0, lcheck: 0, ncheck: 0, flags: 0x20, ssize: 
> 64, susage: 34, cswcnt: 423, tot_run_time: 52799ms)
> 52802:  ble_ll (prio: 0, tid: 1, lcheck: 0, ncheck: 0, flags: 0x20, ssize: 
> 80, susage: 60, cswcnt: 11, tot_run_time: 0ms)
> 52805:  shell (prio: 1, tid: 2, lcheck: 0, ncheck: 0, flags: 0x20, ssize: 
> 512, susage: 115, cswcnt: 17, tot_run_time: 0ms)
> 52808:  bletiny (prio: 1, tid: 3, lcheck: 0, ncheck: 0, flags: 0x20, ssize: 
> 512, susage: 138, cswcnt: 838, tot_run_time: 0ms)
> 52811: >
> 
> Apparently something has changed in how the stats are enabled in the develop 
> branch though. 
> 
> newt target set myble cflags=-DSTATS_NAME_ENABLE
> 
> Does not enable stats ... 
> 
> 56985: > ?
> Commands:
> 57514:     echo         ?    prompt     tasks  mempools      date
> 57515:        b
> 57516: > stat ble_ll
> Unknown command stat
> 62002: >
> 
> So, should I remove references to the stats from the docs? Or do we need to 
> update the bletiny demo to enable stats again?
> 
> dg
> --
> David G. Simmons
> (919) 534-5099
> Web <https://davidgs.com/> • Blog <https://davidgs.com/davidgs_blog> • 
> Linkedin <http://linkedin.com/in/davidgsimmons> • Twitter 
> <http://twitter.com/TechEvangelist1> • GitHub <http://github.com/davidgs>
> /** Message digitally signed for security and authenticity.  
> * If you cannot read the PGP.sig attachment, please go to 
> * http://www.gnupg.com/ <http://www.gnupg.com/> Secure your email!!!
> * Public key available at keyserver.pgp.com <http://keyserver.pgp.com/>
> **/
> ♺ This email uses 100% recycled electrons. Don't blow it by printing!
> 
> There are only 2 hard things in computer science: Cache invalidation, naming 
> things, and off-by-one errors.
> 
> 

Reply via email to