> On Nov 7, 2016, at 6:15 AM, Sterling Hughes <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> Hi Kevin,
> 
> On 7 Nov 2016, at 9:02, Kevin Townsend wrote:
> 
>> I'm just migrating over to develop for mynewt-core and the newt tools repos, 
>> and noticed the following after updating the command line tools from develop:
>> 
>> - 'newt version' -> returns 0.9.0 in develop, this should probably be 0.10.0 
>> to verify that you are using something different than the master branch?
> 
> +1

I filed a bug on this in Jira a week or so ago.

> 
>> - 'newtmgr version' -> doesn't exist. It might be useful to add this as a 
>> sanity check of sorts when working with multiple branches and versions?
>> 
> 
> +1

+1

> 
>> It's easy enough to send a pull request for these, but I wanted to check if 
>> these two items are perhaps intentional and maybe the 0.10.0 version update 
>> only happens at release?
>> 
> 
> We don’t really have a policy here, which is why the newt version hasn’t been 
> updated.  I think once we roll a release, we should always update newt to the 
> subsequent version, so that people can differentiate.  We might want to have 
> some indicator that it is built off a non-released version as well (maybe a 
> build date?)

I'd like to see the 'develop' branch get a version-string of the next version 
to be released. So since 0.9.0 is the master branch, the develop branch should 
have 1.0.0-dev maybe?

dg
--
David G. Simmons
(919) 534-5099
Web <https://davidgs.com/> • Blog <https://davidgs.com/davidgs_blog> • Linkedin 
<http://linkedin.com/in/davidgsimmons> • Twitter 
<http://twitter.com/TechEvangelist1> • GitHub <http://github.com/davidgs>
/** Message digitally signed for security and authenticity.  
* If you cannot read the PGP.sig attachment, please go to 
 * http://www.gnupg.com/ <http://www.gnupg.com/> Secure your email!!!
 * Public key available at keyserver.pgp.com <http://keyserver.pgp.com/>
**/
♺ This email uses 100% recycled electrons. Don't blow it by printing!

There are only 2 hard things in computer science: Cache invalidation, naming 
things, and off-by-one errors.


Reply via email to