Hi Will,

At the moment, we want to keep it simple.

So the flow is as you mentioned below:
run the bluetooth stack, finish up with
any connections or other advertising/scanning events only then run our 
proprietary RF Stack.

Best Regards
Chew

_____________



Chew:

It really depends on how you want your stack to operate alongside the bluetooth 
stack (in
the time domain). This is a bit hard to put into words, but an example might 
help. Consider
a bluetooth connection. If you are connected to a bluetooth device do you want 
your RF stack
to run in between the connection events? Or do you run the bluetooth stack, 
finish up with any connections or other advertising/scanning events, then run 
your RF stack?




> On Nov 15, 2016, at 10:46 PM, L.M Chew <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> Hi Aditi,
> 
> Thanks for the welcome. :-)
> 
> Currently we have a proprietary RF Stack firmware (it uses proprietary air 
> protocol)
running on a nRF52 chip, we are using Nordic's SDK + FreeRTOS to build this.
> 
> Now we want to port part of the RF Stack firmware into Mynewt so that our 
> nRF52 device
can switch between NimBLE stack and our own RF stack to communicate BLE device 
and our own
proprietary RF device.
> 
> So we like to know what is the best way to do this.
> 
> Best Regards,
> Chew
> 
>> Hi Chew,
>> 
>> Welcome to the Mynewt community! Could you provide a little more detail 
>> about what
you’d
>> like to do? Do you have a radio with a proprietary implementation of the 
>> controller
that you
>> want to integrate with the host portion of the NimBLE stack? The HCI API 
>> will come
in handy
>> there. If you want to take our NimBLE stack and tweak it, you can do that in 
>> a fork
of the
>> repo. If you tell us a little more we can respond better.
>> 
>> thanks,
>> aditi
>> 
>> > On Nov 15, 2016, at 12:18 AM, L.M Chew <[email protected]> wrote:
>> >
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > I like to get some pointer on how to implement my company own proprietary 
>> > Custom
RF Stack
>> aside the Nimble BLE Stack.
>> >
>> > Best Regards,
>> > Chew
> 
>

Reply via email to