Whats the internal thinking on this? Is it being discussed elsewhere? Is the aforementioned rewrite going on, or delayed so it make sense for me to try to get work on the xpc calls?
On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 1:07 PM, Jacob Rosenthal <jakerosent...@gmail.com> wrote: > The gatt dependency actually uses the xpc's reverse engineered by Sandeep > for noble github.com/sandeepmistry/noble (which I have some code on) > which has three separate xpc bindings for mavericks > <https://github.com/sandeepmistry/noble/blob/master/lib/mac/mavericks.js> > yosemite > <https://github.com/sandeepmistry/noble/blob/master/lib/mac/yosemite.js> > and legacy > <https://github.com/sandeepmistry/noble/blob/master/lib/mac/legacy.js> > > Now that the native apis are fairly stable and cover most of what the xpcs > have access to, I think even sandeep doesnt love having to redo the xpcs on > new os releases..But it takes very little to piggyback on the work hes > already done and modernize gatt's xpc handling if thats the only issue... > > > > > > On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 12:10 PM, Jacob Rosenthal <jakerosent...@gmail.com > > wrote: > >> Or at least the newtmgr code as a dependency ;) >> >> On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 6:52 AM, David G. Simmons <santa...@mac.com> >> wrote: >> >>> ook at this app ... >>> >> >> >> >
