I for one am really looking forward to rtt as I dont have serial on several off the shelf devices Im working with.
On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 1:16 AM, Łukasz Rymanowski < [email protected]> wrote: > I suggest to create feature branch for that work in this case. I believe > Michal will fix support for newtmgr, but till then some of us could make > use of RTT and other cool stuff which will go on top (e.g. support for > btmon). > What do you think? > > On 19 April 2017 at 00:23, marko kiiskila <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Thanks for the input; I think we should keep this functional then. > > > > > On Apr 18, 2017, at 12:57 PM, Kevin Townsend <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > > > Shell and newtmgr over serial is a requirement for us with the Mynewt > > board were are planning to release soon. There is a USB Serial bridge > chip > > on there that we use for both the bootloader and newtmgr commands, and > I'd > > certainly like to keep shell support. > > > > > > K. > > > > > > > > > On 18/04/17 20:54, Vipul Rahane wrote: > > >> Ok with that as well. However, considering Chris's comments all STM > > BSPs would need a second UART as it is not created in the BSPs. > > >> > > >> Regards, > > >> Vipul Rahane > > >> > > >>> On Apr 18, 2017, at 9:41 AM, Christopher Collins <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > >>> > > >>> I'm also OK with that. > > >>> > > >>> FYI- apps which need to support both the shell and newtmgr over > serial > > >>> would need the following modifications: > > >>> 1. Replace mgmt/newtmgr/transport/nmgr_shell dependency with > > >>> mgmt/newtmgr/transport/nmgr_uart > > >>> 2. Enable a second UART in the project's syscfg (this would be a > BSP > > >>> setting, likely UART_1). For nRF BSPs, this would be the bit > > >>> banger UART. > > >>> 3. Specify the appropriate UART as the value of the NMGR_UART > syscfg > > >>> setting. Currently, the console UART is hardcoded per-BSP and > > >>> not configurable via syscfg, but the newtmgr UART is > configurable > > >>> (is there a reason this is hardcoded, or is it just a > historical > > >>> thing?). > > >>> > > >>> I think that is everything that would need to be done. > > >>> > > >>> Chris > > >>> > > >>> On Tue, Apr 18, 2017 at 09:31:59AM -0700, marko kiiskila wrote: > > >>>> +1, I’d be ok dropping that support. > > >>>> > > >>>>> On Apr 18, 2017, at 3:58 AM, Michał Narajowski < > > [email protected]> wrote: > > >>>>> > > >>>>> Hi, > > >>>>> > > >>>>> I implemented some console improvements and submitted a pull > request > > >>>>> here: https://github.com/apache/incubator-mynewt-core/pull/230 > > >>>>> > > >>>>> Marko pointed out that it breaks newtmgr and OIC over shell. > Should I > > >>>>> fix those issues or can we drop support for that? How many people > > care > > >>>>> about it? > > >>>>> > > >>>>> Best regards, > > >>>>> Michał > > > > > > > >
