I agree. I'll send out a separate email on that.

Let's come back to the status of the release again.

* MYRIAD-114 <= AFAIK this is the only blocker for the release at the
moment.
* MYRIAD-43 and MYRIAD-98 are fixed (albeit a couple of minor PRs Jim
submitted this morning)
* MYRIAD-150: Jim, do you think anything is remaining? Can we close this?
* MYRIAD-159: Fixed
* MYRIAD-160: Almost Fixed (Yuliya is addressing a review comment)
* MYRIAD-145,MYRIAD-44: On me, will be closed just before the release.

Thanks,
Santosh

On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 5:09 AM, Jim Klucar <klu...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Santosh,
>
> How about deleting some old/dead branches from git before the release?
>
> Jim
>
> On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 5:57 PM, Santosh Marella <smare...@maprtech.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Hello everyone,
> >
> >   Just a quick update on the release status. We still need the following
> > JIRAs to be resolved.
> >
> >   * MYRIAD-43 Replace com.ebay namespace with org.apache
> >   * MYRIAD-98 Move from 4 spaces to 2 spaces for indentation
> >      - Jim is working on both of them
> >
> >   * MYRIAD-114 Automatic dashboard building
> >      - Not sure if anyone is working on this one.
> >        The last comment on JIRA indicates Jim and Ken are collaborating
> to
> > resolve this.
> >
> >   * MYRIAD-150 Update NOTICE file
> >      - I think this is done. The JIRA has to be just marked as Resolved.
> >
> >   * MYRIAD-159 Change default mesos version to 0.24
> >      - A minor one line change, but someone still needs to do it.
> >
> >   * MYRIAD-145 Document Myriad Release Process
> >      - Created a draft on the wiki. Will update it as we tag the RC and
> > publish it for voting.
> >   * MYRIAD-44 Prepare for 0.1.0 release
> >      - Just an Umbrella JIRA keeping track of the individual items.
> >
> >   In addition, Yuliya submitted a PR for MYRIAD-160.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Santosh
> >
> > On Fri, Oct 23, 2015 at 11:32 AM, Santosh Marella <smare...@maprtech.com
> >
> > wrote:
> >
> > > > let Myriad pick a random port outside of Mesos
> > >
> > > Agree with Darin. Picking a port outside of Mesos is prohibitive.
> > >
> > > I felt the simplest solution would be to pick a random port from the
> list
> > > of ports offered to Myriad.
> > >
> > > The right solution, as Darin mentioned in the JIRA, would be to remove
> NM
> > > from RM's memory.
> > > I haven't looked at YARN's code deep enough to see if that's possible.
> > But
> > > that's something worth exploring.
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Santosh
> > >
> > > On Fri, Oct 23, 2015 at 9:57 AM, Darin Johnson <
> dbjohnson1...@gmail.com>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > >> On MYRIAD-160, it's a really bad idea to let Myriad pick a random port
> > >> outside of Mesos as other frameworks might select that port the
> > >> probability
> > >> of that happening is 1-(number of ports requested by other
> > >> frameworks)/(number of ports in use).  This could get near 50% and
> cause
> > >> frameworks that are being good citizens to crash.
> > >>
> > >> I'm also not convinced randomizing the port is in fact the correct fix
> > for
> > >> this in the long term, as there is still a non-zero chance you'll get
> > that
> > >> port again.
> > >>
> > >> Darin
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> On Fri, Oct 23, 2015 at 12:56 AM, yuliya Feldman <
> > >> yufeld...@yahoo.com.invalid> wrote:
> > >>
> > >> > Great list.
> > >> > I would include MYRIAD-160 to the list - I am working on that one.
> Of
> > >> > course as a workaround we could not use Mesos ports and let NM ports
> > >> > randomization kick in.I also almost done with MYRIAD-148 - it was
> > really
> > >> > tricky. Should submit PR tonight.
> > >> > Thanks,Yuliya
> > >> >       From: Darin Johnson <dbjohnson1...@gmail.com>
> > >> >  To: Dev <dev@myriad.incubator.apache.org>
> > >> >  Sent: Thursday, October 22, 2015 8:29 PM
> > >> >  Subject: Re: JIRA work for 0.1.0
> > >> >
> > >> > I think this sounds good about right.  A few Jim marked were new
> > >> features,
> > >> > gotta leave something for the 0.2.0 release :).
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> > On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 8:08 AM, Santosh Marella <
> > smare...@maprtech.com
> > >> >
> > >> > wrote:
> > >> >
> > >> > > I looked at the JIRAs currently marked with fix version
> > >> "myriad-0.1.0".
> > >> > > There were 19 of them. I moved a few out. We are currently at 14.
> > >> > >
> > >> > > However, IMO the show stoppers are really the following:
> > >> > >
> > >> > > MYRIAD-43 Replace com.ebay namespace with org.apache
> > >> > > MYRIAD-44 Prepare for 0.1.0 release
> > >> > > MYRIAD-98 Move from 4 spaces to 2 spaces for indentation
> > >> > > MYRIAD-114 Automatic dashboard building
> > >> > > MYRIAD-145 Document Myriad Release Process
> > >> > > MYRIAD-150 Update NOTICE file
> > >> > > MYRIAD-159 Change default mesos version to 0.24
> > >> > >
> > >> > > Unless anyone thinks there are other JIRAs that are show
> stoppers, I
> > >> > think
> > >> > > we should stick to the above list
> > >> > > and cut a RC as soon as we address the above.
> > >> > >
> > >> > > **I'm positive the above can be fixed by early next week (10/27)
> and
> > >> we
> > >> > can
> > >> > > have a RC out for voting mid next week (10/28).**
> > >> > >
> > >> > > If we can't fix the above JIRAs in time or if new ones come up as
> > >> "show
> > >> > > stoppers", we will have a revised date.
> > >> > > And, of course, more fixes are welcome, as long as they can be
> > merged
> > >> > > before 10/27.
> > >> > >
> > >> > > Just to let everyone know about the Apache release process (@Adam,
> > >> feel
> > >> > > free to chime in):
> > >> > >  - Apache requires that a RC be put out for voting on
> > >> > dev@myriad.incubator
> > >> > > for 72 hrs or until 3 binding +1s and no binding -1s,
> > >> > >  - followed by a similar voting round on general@incubator.
> > >> > >
> > >> > > Now to run the last mile..!
> > >> > >
> > >> > > Cheers,
> > >> > > Santosh
> > >> > >
> > >> > > On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 2:48 PM, Adam Bordelon <
> a...@mesosphere.io>
> > >> > wrote:
> > >> > >
> > >> > > > Keep in mind that Santosh (as Release Manager) has final
> authority
> > >> over
> > >> > > > pushing things out of 0.1.0.
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > I created a (hopefully public) filter for Unresolved 0.1.0
> Myriad
> > >> > JIRAs:
> > >> > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYRIAD-44?filter=12333786
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > Maybe we should create a dashboard too, like
> > >> > > >
> > >> > >
> > >> >
> > >>
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Dashboard.jspa?selectPageId=12327111
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 1:38 PM, Jim Klucar <klu...@gmail.com>
> > >> wrote:
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > > I went through JIRA and assigned a bunch of the tickets to the
> > >> Myriad
> > >> > > > 0.1.0
> > >> > > > > release. Some of them are really low hanging fruit, so I think
> > we
> > >> can
> > >> > > > knock
> > >> > > > > most of these out. As Adam said in the meeting, we'd rather
> have
> > >> too
> > >> > > many
> > >> > > > > flagged for the release and pair down rather than miss some.
> To
> > >> that
> > >> > > end,
> > >> > > > > please go through the tickets that are still unmarked and set
> > the
> > >> Fix
> > >> > > > > Version/s: to Myriad 0.1.0 if you think they should be fixed
> or
> > by
> > >> > the
> > >> > > > > release.
> > >> > > > >
> > >> > > > > Jim
> > >> > > > >
> > >> > > >
> > >> > >
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >>
> > >
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to