Hi community.

I have written the original mail as per instructions on the NB site. JaCoCo is 
effectively not working with NB 11 unless configured in a non-standard way. I 
have spent some time in analyzing and fixing this issue (for me). I am happy to 
contribute the fix to everyone, but somebody entitled needs to agree. Then I 
provide a pull request.

Thanks,
Mark

> Am 23.05.2019 um 18:34 schrieb Mark Herkrath <[email protected]>:
> 
> Hi,
> 
> I am running into issues with JaCoCo in NB 11. It was working well in NB 10.
> 
> The problem is the following, it got introduced by NETBEANS-1768 - 
> "CodeCoverage doesn't work when custom outputDirectory is used in a 
> PluginExecution":
> 
> In the change done, it is tested if the predetermined JaCoCo output directory 
> exists. If it doesn't exist, the outputDirectory variable is overwritten by 
> the outputDirectory configuration of the JaCoCo    report goal. However, if 
> this is not defined, the outputDirectory variable becomes null. As a result, 
> the file is being watched via FileChangeAdapter becomes  C:\Program 
> Files\NetBeans 11.0\bin\jacoco.xml, or similar.
> 
> Now, often the Maven target directory, or at least the JaCoCo output 
> directory, doesn't exist yet when the Code Coverage report is opened. Due to 
> the issue described above, NB doesn't detect when jacoco.xml becomes 
> available and claims that there is no data yet.
> 
> As per my understanding NETBEANS-1768 was fixed incorrectly. The fix should 
> have been only to change line 128:
> outputDirectory = PluginPropertyUtils.getPluginProperty(p, GROUP_JOCOCO, 
> ARTIFACT_JOCOCO, "outputDirectory", null, null); 
> to
> outputDirectory = PluginPropertyUtils.getPluginProperty(p, GROUP_JOCOCO, 
> ARTIFACT_JOCOCO, "outputDirectory", "report", null); 
> 
> As a result, the outputDirectory setting will be taken from the report goal 
> level but it will still picked up correctly if the plug configuration is done 
> at plugin level for example.
> 
> I have commented about this issue at NETBEANS-1997, which was reopened by 
> someone else. Possibly it would be better to create a new ticket. JaCoCo 
> 0.8.3 is working well for me after applying the above change.
> 
> Cheers,
> Mark

Reply via email to