Yes -- please also leave your comments in that issue to urge JetBrains to
donate their code to Apache. It's not a big deal, hundreds (if not more)
companies have done so already and JetBrains can do so too.

Gj

On Thu, Jul 18, 2019 at 10:34 AM Jonathan Bergh <bergh.jonat...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> thanks Geertjan,
>
> yes, i see your new comments.
>
> apart from bumping / commenting on the same thread, do you think there is
> anything else we can do as a community to get this ball rolling properly?
> for whatever reason, it seems pretty strange the code is not being released
> when all it takes is a PR (and they have said they are happy to release
> it)?
>
>
> On Thu, Jul 18, 2019 at 12:12 AM Geertjan Wielenga <geert...@apache.org>
> wrote:
>
> > You can see the new comment I added in the issue you referenced, today:
> >
> > https://github.com/JetBrains/kotlin-netbeans/issues/137
> >
> > Gj
> >
> > On Wed, Jul 17, 2019 at 11:38 PM Jonathan Bergh <
> bergh.jonat...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > I was just wondering what happened with the donation of the Kotlin
> plugin
> > > to the Apache Netbeans project - did they ever go through with this?
> > >
> > > Is this still a need for Apache NB with the advent of Language Servers
> > etc
> > > on the horizon?
> > >
> > > I would like to start getting acquainted with NB platform dev and
> thought
> > > this might be worthwhile looking through. See :
> > >
> > > https://github.com/JetBrains/kotlin-netbeans/issues/122
> > > https://github.com/JetBrains/kotlin-netbeans/issues/137
> > >
> > > for the background.
> > >
> > > I dont have huge amounts of time so i would start slowly, updating the
> > > project to target the latest NB release (11) etc, but i'd request some
> > > assistance with things like where to find the various NBM artifacts
> etc.
> > >
> > > One final question / point - i see lots of this plugin is written in
> > kotlin
> > > itself. Would it be better to transcribe the .kt source into java as
> part
> > > of this effort?
> > >
> > > thanks a lot
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to