Thanks Jiri. (Most) Questions answered. :) Now it's (at least for me) only the question whether the 'old' UCs should be inactive by default or not. In the first case, I think, a note on the 'Available Plugins' tab would be great (as mentioned by Neil).
Ps: About forcing: I was just confused/irritated about that phrase, as I didn't suppose 'forcing' a part of the Apache way. Am Mi., 16. Okt. 2019 um 08:50 Uhr schrieb Jiří Kovalský < [email protected]>: > Dne 15. 10. 19 v 18:14 Christian Pervoelz napsal(a): > > [snip] > > > So, there is a couple of question now: > > What should happen with those plugins not moved over at all, but which > are > > maybe still useful? > > This generic question results in a generic answer so we should rather > talk about such useful plugins individually but we have e-mail addresses > for all plugin authors so we can at least try approaching them via > e-mail. If that does not help, some plugins contain links to their > websites which often means source code repositories hence if someone is > a true fan s/he can clone the repository and take over maintenance or > even development of the popular plugins. > > > Should authors of plugins (dedicated to old NB versions) also be forced > to > > move them and by that update them? > > We could ask them at best. Forcing someone is not an Apache style of > open discussion and meritocracy. > > > How can authors be forced? Do we know, how we can address them? > > Plugin owner [email protected] > > -Jirka > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > > For further information about the NetBeans mailing lists, visit: > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/Mailing+lists > > > >
