+ 1 (binding)

Checksum is OK, tested on Linux and it works fine.

Dusan

________________________________
From: Martin Balín <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, April 12, 2021 5:19 PM
To: [email protected] <[email protected]>
Subject: [External] : [VOTE] Release Apache VSNetBeans 12.4 Beta 2 (VSIX)

Dear community,

As discussed here some time ago I would like to release VSCode NetBeans 12.4 
Beta2 on VSCode marketplace.

Therefore I’m opening the voting for complimentary binaries. Source code was a 
part of previous 12.4 Beta2 voting organized and closed by Geertjan W. already. 
Thank you.

Build artefacts are here:
https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/netbeans/netbeans-vscode-ext/12.4-beta2/__;!!GqivPVa7Brio!OCK2_Ftjx7m2kxr-MDLxVeARRSy9ufL7cCxFYB1j119fzP_MRFMG0P0pQce8B4hd$

We are primarily voting on VSIX complimentary binaries available here:
https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/netbeans/netbeans-vscode-ext/12.4-beta2/apache-netbeans-java-12.3.991.vsix__;!!GqivPVa7Brio!OCK2_Ftjx7m2kxr-MDLxVeARRSy9ufL7cCxFYB1j119fzP_MRFMG0P0pQQbugKx3$

PGP signature and SHA 512 are available along the binaries:
https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/netbeans/netbeans-vscode-ext/12.4-beta2/apache-netbeans-java-12.3.991.vsix.asc__;!!GqivPVa7Brio!OCK2_Ftjx7m2kxr-MDLxVeARRSy9ufL7cCxFYB1j119fzP_MRFMG0P0pQUS5jxdB$
https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/netbeans/netbeans-vscode-ext/12.4-beta2/apache-netbeans-java-12.3.991.vsix.sha512__;!!GqivPVa7Brio!OCK2_Ftjx7m2kxr-MDLxVeARRSy9ufL7cCxFYB1j119fzP_MRFMG0P0pQUPF6lA5$

Version of 12.4 Beta2 VSIX is 12.3.991 as VSCode does not support versions like 
“12.4.Beta2”.

This vote is going to be open at least 72 hours, vote with +1, 0, and -1 as 
usual. (Please justify -1.) Please mark your vote with (binding) if, and
only, if you're an Apache NetBeans PMC member to help with voting admin. Only 
respond if you are going to vote*, i.e., this is *NOT* a discussion thread.

Thank you,
Martin Balin


Reply via email to