On Sat, 11 Sept 2021 at 18:58, Matthias Bläsing <[email protected]> wrote: > I'm mildly irritated, that trivial JARs are considered a problem for > the 12.5 release, while a huge pile of files is completely excluded > from RAT scanning.
+1, but don't be irritated! :-) Part of the problem is that we haven't updated our release emails to cover them, or the branding folders with jar names that have also caused similar concerns. It's something to look at, along with some of the other text, before 12.6. > There is IMHO _nothing_ in this, that warrants doubts on the > cleanliness of the release. +1 I did similar checks for 12.4. > I'll see if I can remove them all all, but for 12.5 IMHO this is out of > scope and also unnessary. It's unnecessary anyway, except possibly on the point that was made on legal-disuss about harder to review, and that's minor. And probably pointless unless we decided to address all the other archive formats? Best wishes, Neil --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] For further information about the NetBeans mailing lists, visit: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/Mailing+lists
