This will probably be heresy, but any reason to not bump up to v13 so that it's blatantly obvious something dramatic has changed? (Base JDK is kind of dramatic)
- Re: [DISCUSS] Let's require NetBeans to be ... Neil C Smith
- Re: [DISCUSS] Let's require NetBeans to be buil... Neil C Smith
- Re: [DISCUSS] Let's require NetBeans to be ... Michael Bien
- Re: [DISCUSS] Let's require NetBeans to... Neil C Smith
- Re: [DISCUSS] Let's require NetBeans to... Michael Bien
- Re: [DISCUSS] Let's require NetBeans to be built wi... Michael Bien
- Re: [DISCUSS] Let's require NetBeans to be buil... Eric Bresie
- Re: [DISCUSS] Let's require NetBeans to be buil... Jaroslav Tulach
- Re: [DISCUSS] Let's require NetBeans to be ... Michael Bien
- Re: [DISCUSS] Let's require NetBeans to be built with JD... Ernie Rael
- Re: [DISCUSS] Let's require NetBeans to be built wi... Will Hartung
- Re: [DISCUSS] Let's require NetBeans to be buil... Neil C Smith
- Re: [DISCUSS] Let's require NetBeans to be built wi... Jaroslav Tulach
- Re: [DISCUSS] Let's require NetBeans to be buil... Eric Bresie
- Re: [DISCUSS] Let's require NetBeans to be ... Matthias Bläsing
- Re: [DISCUSS] Let's require NetBeans to... Jaroslav Tulach
- Re: [DISCUSS] Let's require NetBeans to... Scott Palmer
- Re: [DISCUSS] Let's require NetBeans to... Michael Bien
- Re: [DISCUSS] Let's require NetBeans to be ... Ernie Rael
- Re: [DISCUSS] Let's require NetBeans to... Jeremy Cavanagh
- Re: [DISCUSS] Let's require NetBeans to... Eric Bresie
