Dne neděle 6. března 2022 13:46:23 CET, Michael Bien napsal(a):
> On 06.03.22 05:07, Jaroslav Tulach wrote:
> > Dne sobota 5. března 2022 17:54:46 CET, antonio napsal(a):
> >> a) do we need these now that JDK >= 11 is required to run NetBeans?
> >> b) if not, can we get rid of them?
> > 
> > No, we cannot get rid of them. While we are compiling on JDK11, the
> > requirement still is to run and test on JDK8. That can only change with
> > voting.
> 
> Hi Jaroslav,
> 
> NB 12.6 and 13 itself only support JDK 11 and 17, if some of it still
> runs on 8 its a coincidence. Nobody should run the IDE on 8.

I do. I am running my NetBeans on JDK8 based GraalVM. And it is not a 
coincidence - it is an important use-case for my business unit.

> But as you pointed out some modules which are used by the language
> server have to be kept compatible with 8 unfortunately, which causes a
> lot of ongoing issues but it is what it is.

Can I get pointer to the list of "lot of ongoing issues", please? Thank you.

> i can't even vote on it since i am a mere contributor, but am sure
> someone could setup a vote for the second part if there is demand, but
> the first decision was already made (here on the list) and the releases
> are public.

Yes, the decision is: the tests must run on JDK8. If you disagree with my 
statement, present an evidence: show me where a decision to drop JDK8 for 
(automatic) testing has been made!

> Apache released binaries require JDK 11/17

Not technically - the binaries run on JDK8 fine. Apache NetBeans project just 
doesn't provide support for those who run complementary binaries on JDK8. End 
users certainly shall use JDK11+ - integrators building on top of NetBeans 
Platform can however use JDK8.
-jt




---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

For further information about the NetBeans mailing lists, visit:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/Mailing+lists



Reply via email to