On Thu, 6 Oct 2022 at 18:02, Ernie Rael <err...@raelity.com> wrote: > -1 to DISCUSSION? Wow. That's pretty draconian ...It feels like FUD right now.
Literally no-one is -1'ing discussion, just while we're calling FUD out! ;-) > Is the claim that using older JDK for runtime rarely happens? I don't > have any data, but...; NetBeans is a case in point, and I know of > others; it can be a corporate (ie irrational:-) ) decision. Well, relying on a global JDK to run NetBeans is possibly irrational to start with, considering other options bundle a runtime. There are obviously older JDK use cases, but I'm just not sure NetBeans itself is the best example. > There seems to be a resounding '-1', but I'm not sure for what really. What does integration mean? If it's anything like the original linked PR then, yes, there is already a resounding -1, which actually means it was vetoed. No other proposal is given. For me, no bundling, no pushing as the default compilation option. Otherwise, try and ensure it works well with the IDE for those who desire it. Add bespoke support in additional modules if it's *really* necessary (personally I'd prefer it was a plugin). Best wishes, Neil --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@netbeans.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@netbeans.apache.org For further information about the NetBeans mailing lists, visit: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/Mailing+lists
