Commit hash is the following 059417a5428c1265dac36f08cbe895134dab439b
Will create a repo so beta3 (or 1.0) will have a place for the future😃 (nebeans-packager.git sounds ok ? - For the vote it self the nbpackage look ok BUT I have exception on executing the linux-deb (I'm on wsl but did get missing tools error) ./nbpackage --input ../../../netbeans-16-bin.zip --type linux-deb -Pname="Apache NetBeans" -Pversion=16 -Purl="https://netbeans.apache.org"; -Pdeb.maintainer="NetBeans Mailing List <us...@netbeans.apache.org>" -Pdeb.desktop-filename="apache-netbeans-ide-16" -Pdeb.wmclass="Apache NetBeans IDE 16" Creating task for linux-deb packager. Checking image creation prerequisites. Checking package creation prerequisites. Building image from /mnt/c/Users/barboni/Downloads/nbpackage-1.0-beta2-bin/nbpackage-1.0-beta2/bin/../../../netbeans-16-bin.zip. Building package from /mnt/c/Users/ barboni/Downloads/nbpackage-1.0-beta2-bin/nbpackage-1.0-beta2/bin/apache-netbeans_16-1_all. Exception Null Eric -----Message d'origine----- De : Neil C Smith <neilcsm...@apache.org> Envoyé : mercredi 30 novembre 2022 12:11 À : dev@netbeans.apache.org Objet : Re: [VOTE] Release NBPackage 1.0-beta2 and Apache NetBeans 16 DEB and RPM packages On Wed, 30 Nov 2022 at 10:38, Eric Barboni <sk...@apache.org> wrote: > Sorry this is vote thread pollution. I thought about that, but inclined to disagree - this is a vote on one thing (NBPackage) and various convenience binary artefacts deriving from it. Still, if you insist I'll split into two votes, one dependent on the other? > I would suggest having nbpackage on it's own repo too easy process, having > release note , git tag ... for it that not mix with pp3 synergy and others > wiki related item. > I would happy to the migration if ok. It will ony delay by 24h(if I'm slow) > the vote but make nbpackage release life easier in the future. My plan was to migrate it before the next release (it wasn't my idea to put it in netbeans-tools to start with). It wasn't migrated before now due to pending PRs and schedule. Ideally we'd then build the packages with the released tool on the CI for NB17. Right now, can we leave where it is for beta2? I've done all the artefacts twice already (don't ask - there was a beta1!) :-) Best wishes, Neil --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@netbeans.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@netbeans.apache.org For further information about the NetBeans mailing lists, visit: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/Mailing+lists --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@netbeans.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@netbeans.apache.org For further information about the NetBeans mailing lists, visit: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/Mailing+lists
