Hey Arsi,
thx for your support to bring this further, but I see the same, we don't
need a new package which makes similiar stuff, that we already have.
There is no reason to not put it into the core.
Please do a PR and I think you will get help from others for more time.
I also think that some stuff needs to be done after another is also
possible withtin the core. Maybe the core needs to be enhanced then, if
there is smth missing.
Cheers
Chris
P.S. It is out of scope yes but what happens with the NBAndroid stuff
from you?
Am 12.11.2023 um 08:14 schrieb arsi:
Hi,
why don't you open a PR? Not only do we have some LSP tests, CI can
also produce a dev-build for those who are interested in testing the
change. The PR dev builds do include the rust cluster too.
(I don't know whether /initialize/ or /initialized/ is correct, but
this might make things easier)
According to the description of that procedure, it should be called
after the server responds to initialize, as an acknowledgement.
I forgot to write that I also updated the version of lsp4j to 0.21.1
It needs to be tested if the addition of initialized won't make a
problem with another LSP and unfortunately I don't have the time to do
that...
And I have a slightly different opinion about the tests... Tests only
check the possibilities that the author had in mind. So they...
I needed to add good support for Rust to Netbeans because I'm like a
trained monkey, any other IDE kills me. So I added it🤣.
ArSi
------------------------------------------------------------------------
