It doesn’t need to be. Maybe the difference is size is built-in JavaFX. Gj
On Mon, 23 Feb 2026 at 21:48, Pieter van den Hombergh < [email protected]> wrote: > The difference is the packaged jdk. > Codelerity uses tempting, FoAN uses the Azul Zulu variant of openjdk. > Other than size and licence I do not known of any technical differences, > because I have not studied them. > I was told that FoAN is somehow bound to Zulu, so I complied. > > > > > met vriendelijke groet > Pieter van den Hombergh > > Op ma 23 feb 2026, 20:57 schreef Peter Hull <[email protected]>: > > > On Mon, 23 Feb 2026 at 19:49, Pieter van den Hombergh > > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > At the time codelerity installers were on line the FoAN installer page > > was > > > not linked to from the NetBeans.org download page. So probably no > > downloads > > > for NB28 from the FoAN site. > > > > Thanks Pieter. What I meant was - when NB29 installers are available > > from both FoAN and Codelerity, will there be any practical difference > > between them? > > (As I understand it from Neil's message Codelerity will continue > > releasing alongside FoAN) > > > > Peter > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > > > > For further information about the NetBeans mailing lists, visit: > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/Mailing+lists > > > > > > > > >
