@Christian: no, Oracle still has to sign the code grant. Only after that can we actually import code into an Apache repository.
--emi On Fri, Dec 9, 2016 at 11:32 AM, Christian Lenz <[email protected]> wrote: > As I understand it right, it is not done yet, right? So we can't use > NetBeans via git or? > > > > Gesendet: Freitag, 09. Dezember 2016 um 10:21 Uhr > Von: "Julien Enselme" <[email protected]> > An: [email protected] > Betreff: Re: Git Repository Size Management > My opinion (sorry for the delay): the converted repo is still big but I > think it's small enough not to cause any trouble. Hell, it's about 3Go > less than the current mercurial one. And as you said it's below 1Go. > > So I think we should keep NetBeans in a single repo. > > @Emilian Good work with the import by the way. > > On Tue, 2016-11-29 at 19:06 +0200, Emilian Bold wrote: > > Yes, we also talked about git clone --depth in the 'Shallow git > > clones as > > an option to a split repository' thread. > > > > Seems to me the repository problem has been fixed. > > > > A fully migrated git repository is at a manageable size: 800MB or so. > > > > People could also use git clone --depth or a non-authoritative > > repository > > (which doesn't even have to be ours) which needs git replace. > > > > > > > > --emi > > > > On Tue, Nov 29, 2016 at 6:56 PM, Paul Merlin <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > > > Emilian Bold a écrit : > > > > Git Replace does sound nice, so we should also provide a > > > > > > non-authoritative > > > > repository with a minimal history for casual or bandwidth limited > > > > contributors. > > > > > > git clone --depth allows "casual or bandwith limited contributors" > > > to > > > clone only a part of the history from a remote repository > > > > > > > -- > Julien Enselme > http://www.jujens.eu/ >
