In sorting through the files and doing the relicensing, since it's going to
be a very large set of changes, we'd like to do one big merge from a fork.
I.e., we propose doing a fork of incubator-netbeans to, for example,
github.com/geertjanwielenga, and then doing all the license changes there,
after which we'd do one big merge into incubator-netbeans.

https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NETBEANS-54

Gj

On Tue, Sep 12, 2017 at 12:22 AM, Ate Douma <[email protected]> wrote:

> On 2017-09-11 22:42, Jan Lahoda wrote:
>
>> Hi Ate,
>>
>> On Mon, Sep 11, 2017 at 10:00 PM, Ate Douma <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> Wonderful news and big next step indeed!
>>>
>>> Now, while I understand everyone being 'trigger happy' to start
>>> committing
>>> improvements, fixes, etc. (and currently I already see 2 addition
>>> commits)
>>>
>>>
>> As Geertjan mentions - one of the commits was necessary to allow the build
>> pass.  The other wasn't strictly necessary, but it is easier to say that
>> building is done using by invoking "ant" than by invoking "ant
>> -Dcluster.config=basic".
>>
>> the next step should be to adjust the license headers!
>>
>
> Thanks, all cool!
>
> Ate
>
>
>
>>>
>> Feedback would be welcome on comments in:
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NETBEANS-54
>>
>> Thanks for you support and insights,
>>      Jan
>>
>>
>>
>>> Which this should be done by a Oracle representing committer, e.g. like
>>> what
>>> Jaroslav did for the -html4j repository.
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Ate (who regrettably has very limited time this week to monitor anything
>>> going on here)
>>>
>>>
>>> On 2017-09-11 17:04, Geertjan Wielenga wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi all,
>>>>
>>>> Big milestone --
>>>>
>>>> git://git.apache.org/incubator-netbeans.git
>>>>
>>>> https://github.com/apache/incubator-netbeans
>>>>
>>>> The main repo from the 1st code donation has landed in Apache Git,
>>>> mirrored
>>>> at Apache GitHub.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks all, especially Petr Gebauer, for doing the push, and thanks also
>>>> for the great support via Apache infra today.
>>>>
>>>> Gj
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>

Reply via email to